FIN600 Financial Management (Scenario Analysis Report) Assignment Help

ASSESSMENT 1 BRIEF 

Subject Code and Title 

FIN600 Financial Management

Assessment Task 

Scenario Analysis Report

Individual/Group 

Individual 

Length 

1,000 words

Learning Outcomes 

The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful  completion of the task below include:  

a) Appraise the functions of a financial manager in  

contemporary businesses and within the current regulatory  and legal context.  

d) Evaluate cost structures and budgets and their impacts on  short- and long-term business decisions.

Submission 

12-week duration: 

Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday, end of Week 4 

6-week duration: 

Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday, end of Week 2

Weighting 

20%

Total Marks 

100 marks 


Assessment Task 

Drawing on your understanding of the fundamentals of financial management, as well as costs,  budgets and management control, write a 1,000-word scenario analysis report identifying, measuring  and analysing the budget variances of a fictitious company. More detailed information about this  fictitious company can be found in the Assessments area of the subject site. This assessment is a  practical task involving the application of budgeting skills, comparison of actual performance with the  budget and analysis of the observed variances. The aim of this assessment task is to consolidate your  knowledge and skills relating to the financial management of business operations. 

Context 

Budget variances refer to the differences between the actual financial results of a company and the  budgeted or planned financial results for a specific period. These variances can be either favourable  or unfavourable, depending on whether the actual results are better or worse than what was planned. Understanding and analysing budget variances is important for companies because it allows them to identify areas of their business that may be underperforming or overperforming. By comparing actual  results to planned results, businesses can identify where they need to make changes in order to  improve profitability, reduce costs or increase revenue. Performing variance analysis is one of the  many activities that a management accountant performs when providing financial and non-financial  information to aid effective decision-making in an organisation. 

This assessment task will focus on three types of variances: direct materials, direct labour and  overhead variances. Interpreting these variances successfully requires you to both analyse and  evaluate. This includes breaking down each variance into its components as follows. 

Direct materials variance 

Direct materials price variance Direct materials usage variance

Direct labour variance 

Labour rate variance 

Labour efficiency variance

Overhead variance 

Overhead spending variance 

Overhead efficiency variance


The formulas for the variances above are found in the Costs, Budgets and Management Control  module, under the Variance Analysis topic. 

Instructions 

In this assessment task, you will take the role of the management accountant of the company and  analyse variances based on a comparison of the actual performance of the business operations  relative to its budgeted performance. To be successful in this assessment task, you are required to  follow the steps below.  

1) Read and understand the topics covered in the modules:  

Introduction to Financial Management 

Costs, Budgets and Management Control 

2) Analyse the additional information in the Assessment 1 Variance Analysis Template (MS Excel  file), which is provided in the Assessments area of the subject site. The template contains the  following sheets:  

Background Information – includes details about the fictitious company and further  instructions about how to use the sheets in the template. 

Data – includes information on standard budget and actual performance.  

Template – contains empty cells in which you are to insert the correct formula and  calculate the required item.  

Variance Report Format – outlines the information required in the variance report that  you are required to submit to support your scenario analysis report.  

3) Write a scenario analysis report supported by a variance report, based on the data and  operational details of a fictitious company provided in Step 2. Your variance report should  follow the format provided in the Assessment 1 Variance Analysis Template (MS Excel file). 

4) Using the information from the business operations, budget and the actual production and  costs data, you are required to identify, measure and analyse the following variances and  investigate their sources: 

• Direct material variances 

• Direct labour variances 

• Overhead variances 

5) In your scenario analysis report, you are required to: 

• summarise and present your variance analyses 

• evaluate your variance calculations in Steps 2–4, discuss the potential causes for the  variances and provide any remedial measures that can be taken to minimise the variances 

• recommend to the client what position to take in relation to each of the three (3) variances  determined, based on your evaluation of the variance calculations. 

Scenario Analysis Report Structure and Format  

Your 1,000-word scenario analysis report should follow industry standards and be structured as shown  in detail below: 

Executive Summary – In this section (100–150 words), you are required to summarise your entire  report. As a minimum, you will need to discuss the purpose of your report, the methodology you have  used, the key findings and your recommendations. The executive summary is not included in the word  count. 

Table of Contents – This section is not included in the word count. 

1. Background (around 150 words) – Provide a description of the task, the tools and methods that  will be applied, and how the report is organised. 

2. Standard budget (around 50 words, in addition to the tabulation) – Using information on the  production design and process, as provided within the Assessments area of the subject site,  tabulate a standard budget for the specified production volumes. 

3. Comparison of the actuals with the budget (around 50 words, in addition to the tabulation) – Calculate and tabulate the variances, while distinguishing the variances into material, labour and  overhead variances, and their sources

4. Analysis of Variances (around 400 words) – Discuss the potential reasons for the variances, their  significance and possible ways to resolve the more critical variances.  

5. Recommendations and Overall Assessment (around 350 words) – Use the variances of the  company, as revealed by the analysis you have undertaken, to recommend what position the

client should take in relation to each of the three (3) variances listed in Step 4 in the Instructions  section. 

6. References – A minimum of six (6) academic and related references (e.g. journal articles, book  chapters, conference papers) and at least two (2) non-academic and related references (e.g.  company websites and annual reports, newspaper articles, government websites, consultant  reports, etc.) are required to support the discussions in your scenario analysis report. Please make  sure your references are current. All references should be in the current APA style. Using  Wikipedia, Investopedia and similar sources should be avoided. This section is not included in the  word count. 

Read the assessment rubric, which is an evaluation guide with the criteria for grading your assessment.  This explains what features a successful scenario analysis report should exhibit. 

Referencing 

It is essential that you use current APA style for citing and referencing the sources that you use.  Please see more information on citing and referencing guidelines on the Academic Success webpage. 

Assessment Support 

For a range of additional resources and support to help you complete your assessment, please  consult the Study Support page on the Student Hub.  

Academic Integrity 

All students are responsible for ensuring that their submitted work is original, adheres to academic  writing standards outlined in the Torrens University Academic Writing Guide, and is appropriately  referenced according to the guidelines provided in the Torrens University APA Referencing Guide. 

Students need to have read and be aware of the Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity  Policy, Academic Integrity Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. For more  information, please refer to the Academic Integrity guidelines and the Torrens University Library. 

Students must also keep all required evidence in making an assessment; a copy of all submitted  material and any assessment drafts. 

Generative AI 

Please refer to the Torrens University Library for guidance on the use of Generative AI. Please speak  to your learning facilitator regarding the use of GenAI tools in your assessments. 


Submission Instructions 

Submit all components of Assessment 1 via Assessments > Briefs & Submissionsin the main navigation  menu in FIN600 Financial Management:  

Scenario analysis report (MS Word file) 

Variance report (MS Excel file) 

Important Note: 

Please ensure that you have attached all components of Assessment 1 (both the ‘Scenario  analysis report’ and the ‘Variance report’) to the Assessment 1 submission point before clicking  the ‘Submit’ button.  

Please name your file using the following format:  

o SubjectCode_Surname_FirstNameInitial_AssessmentNumber 

e.g. FIN600_Jones_S_Assessment 1.docx 

Your marked assessment can be viewed in MyLearn. 

Assessment Due Dates and Late Penalties 

Assessments may be submitted on or before the due date. Late penalties apply for assessments that  are submitted after the due date. 

Refer to:  

Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework (HE) and ELICOS  

Torrens University | Think Education 

Assessment Special Consideration Guidelines for Students (HE Coursework)  

Torrens University | Think Education 

Student Hub for Assessment Extension Information. 

Special Consideration 

To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment task or exam due to  unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher  Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed  Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your learning facilitator.

Assessment Rubric

Assessment Criteria

High Distinction 

(Exceptional) 

85-100%

Distinction 

(Advanced) 

75-84%

Credit 

(Proficient) 

65-74%

Pass 

(Functional) 

50-64%

Fail  

(Yet to achieve  

minimum standard) 

0-49%

Understanding of the  concepts of budget  variances and their  relevance to financial  decision-making 

Percentage for this  criterion = 10%

Excellent understanding  of the key concepts  

required to undertake  variance analysis. 

Comprehensive use of  information from the  

readings/research  

provided in the subject to  substantiate  

understanding of key  

concepts.

Thorough understanding of  the key concepts required to  undertake variance analysis. 

Detailed use of information  from the readings/research  provided in the subject to  substantiate understanding  of key concepts. 

Adequate understanding of  the key concepts required  to undertake variance  

analysis. 

Sufficient use of  

information from the  

readings/research provided  in the subject to  

substantiate understanding  of key concepts.

Basic understanding of the  key concepts required to  undertake variance  

analysis. 

Minimal use of  

information from the  

readings/research  

provided in the subject to  substantiate  

understanding of key  

concepts.

Limited or no  

understanding of the key  concepts required to  

undertake variance  

analysis. 

Does not use information  from the readings/research  provided in the subject to  substantiate understanding  of key concepts.

Identification and  measurement of  

variances for direct  materials, direct  

labour and overhead  costs 

Percentage for this  criterion = 30%

All variance calculations  are accurately identified  and comprehensively  

completed without error. 

All variance calculations are  accurately identified and  thoroughly completed, with  few or no errors. 

Most of the variance  

calculations are correctly  identified and completed,  with occasional errors.

Some variance calculations  are identified and  

completed correctly but not  all.

Variance calculations have  not been identified and/or  attempted or are mostly  incorrect.


Investigation of the  causes of the  

variances 

Percentage for this  criterion = 20%

Hypotheses relating to the  causes of variances are  highly developed and  

cover all the information  given in the scenario.  

There is extensive  

evidence of research and  evaluation in the  

investigative approach.

Hypotheses relating to the  causes of variances are  

thorough and cover all the  information given in the  

scenario.  

There is substantial evidence  of research and evaluation in  the investigative approach.

Hypotheses relating to the  causes of variances are  adequate and cover most of  the information given in the  scenario.  

There is some evidence of  research and evaluation in  the investigative approach.

Hypotheses provide limited  insight on the potential  causes of variances. 

There is limited evidence of  research and evaluation in  the investigative approach.

Hypotheses relating to the  potential causes of  

variances have not been  attempted or are  

unreasonable. 

Evidence of research and  evaluation in the  

investigative approach is  missing.

Recommendations  for improving the  company’s  

performance based  on the analysis of  variances 

Percentage for this  criterion = 20%

Recommendations  

demonstrate a deep and  comprehensive  

understanding of the key  issues involved. 

Recommendations are  entirely realistic and  

feasible, accounting for  potential barriers or  

challenges.

Recommendations  

demonstrate a developed  understanding of the key  issues involved. 

Recommendations are mostly  realistic and feasible,  

accounting for potential  barriers or challenges.

Recommendations  

demonstrate a reasonable  understanding of the key  issues involved. 

Recommendations are  

somewhat realistic and  feasible, accounting for  potential barriers or  

challenges.

Recommendations  

demonstrate a basic  

understanding of the key  issues involved. 

Recommendations are not  always realistic and  

feasible, and do not  

account for potential  

barriers or challenges.

Recommendations are  

missing or demonstrate  limited or no understanding  of the key issues involved.  

Recommendations are  

either meaningless or  

trivial.

Professional,  

complete and  

organised report  

structure and format 

Percentage for this  criterion = 10% 

The report’s structure and  format are highly  

professional and  

consistently adhere to  industry  

practices/standards. 

All components of the  report are clearly and  

correctly identified. 

The report is expertly  

organised and orderly  throughout.

The report’s structure and  format closely reflect  

industry practices/standards  on almost all occasions. 

All components of the report  are correctly identified. 

The report is well-organised  and orderly throughout.

The report’s structure and  format adequately follow  industry  

practices/standards on  most occasions.  

The components of the  report are adequately  

identified. 

Almost all sections of the  report are well-organised.

The report’s structure and  format follow industry  

practices/standards on  some occasions.  

Some components of the  report are identified. 

Most sections of the report  are organised.

The report’s structure and  format do not adhere to  industry  

practices/standards. 

The components of the  report are not adequately  identified. 

All or most sections of the  report are poorly  

organised.

Research and  

Referencing 

Percentage for this  criterion = 10%

Demonstrates use of high  quality, credible and  

relevant resources to  

support and develop  

arguments and position  statements.  

Refers to sources  

throughout; uses most  recent edition of APA  

referencing, with no  

errors.

Demonstrates use of good  quality, credible and relevant  resources to support and  develop arguments and  

statements.  

Refers to sources throughout;  uses most recent edition of  APA referencing, with very  few errors.

Demonstrates use of  

credible resources to  

support and develop ideas.  

Adequately refers to  

sources; uses most recent  edition of APA referencing,  with occasional errors.

Demonstrates use of  

credible and relevant  

resources to support and  develop ideas, but these are  not always explicit or well developed.  

Rarely refers to sources;  uses most recent edition of  APA referencing, with  

frequent errors.

Demonstrates inconsistent  use of good quality,  

credible and relevant  

resources to support and  develop ideas.  

Did not refer to sources;  referencing does not  

resemble the most recent  edition of APA.