MN692 Capstone Project T1 Assignment Help

Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
Trimester	T1 2026
Unit Code	MN692
Unit Title	Capstone Project
Assessment Type	Assessment 1 – Group Report and Individual Report
Assessment Title	Project Detailed Design
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping)	Students should be able to demonstrate their achievements in the following unit learning outcomes: a. Demonstrate the ability to conceptualise, research, design, plan and execute a substantial capstone project b. Adapt and apply the knowledge and skills acquired over the core units of the course in planning and executing a capstone project in an area related to Networking e. Demonstrate the application of knowledge and skills with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability while being part of a team-based working environment.
Weight	10% of the total assessment
Total Marks	100% equals the full 10 marks Final Mark = Group Report Mark x Individual Report Mark
Word limit	N/A
Due Date	Group Report: Week 3, Sunday, 5 April 2026, 23:59 PM Individual Report: Week 3, Sunday, 5 April 2026, 23:59 PM
Submission Guidelines Including the Use of Gen AI Tools	• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Roboto font, and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. The group written report must adhere to the provided template style. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using the IEEE referencing style. • Late submission penalty: a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day, 0% score for more than 5 days late submission. • Students must ensure before submission of the final version of the assignment that the similarity percentage as computed by Turnitin must be less than 10%. Assignments with more than 10% similarity may not be considered for marking. • GENERATIVE AI USE IS PROHIBITED: The student is expected to complete this assessment without using automated tools.
Extension	If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:
Academic Misconduct	Academic Misconduct is a serious offense. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: . For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.

MN692 Capstone Project T1 Assessment 2 Assignments Help

ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION

The MN692 Capstone Project builds on the work completed in MN690 Research Methods and Project Management from the previous trimester, but only if you retain the same group members in your tutorial session. If your team composition changes, you may be assigned a new topic and will be required to complete the project implementation accordingly. Please note that MN692 involves working with a real industry client, typically on a topic that aligns closely with your MN690 project.

The industry project report consists of two distinct stages. The first stage focuses on the project’s detailed design, while the second stage involves its implementation and analysis. Each stage requires the submission of both group and individual reports, contributing to Assessments 1 and 2.

Individual marks for each team member will be calculated for each assessment using the following process:

• Group marks for the written report will be assigned based on the group report assignment. • Each team member will receive an individual mark for the individual report assignment, which will be scaled by a factor of 1.

• The final mark for each student will be determined by multiplying the group report mark by this scaled individual mark.

• Failure to submit an individual report will result in a score of 0 for the student.

The group report must be submitted solely by the designated leader through the assigned group submission link. Individual reports should be submitted separately via the specified link. Only the assigned group leader is responsible for submitting the required files through the Moodle assignment submission link. Ensure that the full report is submitted, including all required contents starting from the cover page. Penalties will be applied in cases where multiple students submit highly similar files, as this may be regarded as plagiarism.

Note: If you need help with any assignment from Melbourne Institute of Technology, Gradespire provides complete support with high-quality solutions, expert guidance, and timely delivery to help you achieve better academic results.

GROUP ASSIGNMENT TASK

In this phase, your goal is to complete both Section 1 (Introduction) and Section 2 (Project Detailed Design) of your industry report. Ensure to attach the required documents for Appendix 1, Industry Client Information. Make sure to follow the provided final report template diligently, as it outlines the necessary structure for your report.

Introduction [20% Mark] Briefly describe your project, including its purpose, objectives, industry client information, and key challenges. If you completed the MN690 on a similar topic, summarise your previous work, highlighting research findings and design decisions. If you are starting with a new topic at this stage, provide background information on the project, including its scope, industry relevance, and initial requirements or constraints identified before implementation. Additionally, provide a concise outline of the report.

Detailed Project Design [70% Mark] This section presents a detailed project plan outlining key tasks and deliverables to ensure effective implementation. A structured approach enhances coordination by covering critical aspects such as block diagram implementation, software and hardware requirements, team responsibilities, and weekly activities, as detailed below:

• Implementation Overview [30% Mark] You are required to provide a high-level overview of the implementation process, outlining the chosen methodology, key project phases, and a block diagram illustrating the system architecture. This section should clearly explain how the project will be executed in alignment with the project proposal provided by the industry client.

• Software and Hardware Requirements [20% Mark] This section outlines the essential tools and resources required for the project before detailing the execution plan. The requirements can be categorised into software and hardware specifications.

• Weekly Activities and Team Responsibilities Plan [20% Mark] This section outlines the weekly activities timeline and team roles and responsibilities for MN692. It includes a detailed table mapping out weekly activities with a comprehensive timeline for task completion. Additionally, it defines the roles and responsibilities of each team member, ensuring clear articulation of contributions and expectations to promote effective coordination.

Reference and Presentation [10% Mark] Each student is required to provide at least three references from sources published within the past five years. Ensure that your report is meticulously structured, with proper formatting, accurate spelling and grammar, adherence to the IEEE reference style, and a well-designed cover page and table of contents. Before submission, thoroughly review your template and remove all provided instructional content, keeping only the section headings. This step is essential to prevent high similarity in your assessment.

Check Now: MN692 Capstone Project Assignment Help

GROUP ASSIGNMENT MARKING CRITERIA

Section	Description	Marks (%)
Introduction	• Clearly describe the project’s purpose, objectives, industry relevance, client information, and key challenges. • Summarise MN690 findings (if applicable) or provide background, scope, and constraints for new topics. • Present a well-organised report outline with clear, concise, and professional writing.	20%
Detailed Project Design	Implementation Overview • Provide a high-level overview of the implementation process, including the methodology, key project phases, and a block diagram representing the system architecture. Software and Hardware Requirements • Provide a list of all the required software along with their detailed specifications and appropriate references. • Provide a list of all the required hardware along with their detailed specifications and appropriate references. Weekly Activities and Team Responsibilities Plan • Develop a table outlining weekly activities with a comprehensive timeline for task completion during this implementation stage. • Define and specify the roles and responsibilities of each team member at this stage of the project.	30% 20% 20%
References & Presentation	• Each student must provide at least three references from sources published within the past five years, adhering to the IEEE reference style. • Adhere to the prescribed template presentation format.	10%
Industry Client Information	• Provide the industry client details, including the signatures of both the client and, if different, the contact person.	HURDLE
Total		100% (10)

GROUP ASSIGNMENT MARKING RUBRIC

Grades

>=80%

High Distinction

70%-79%

Distinction

60% – 69%

Credit

50% – 59%

Pass

<50%

Fail

Introduction

Clear, well

structured,

concise, and

professionally written. Strong justification

with all

required

details.

Well-written

with relevant

details and

good structure. Minor gaps in justification or clarity.

Covers the

basics but

lacks depth in explanation or clarity. Some inconsistenci es.

Limited details with poor

structure and weak

justification.

Needs

significant

improvement.

Inadequate,

unclear, or

missing key

components. Does not meet requirements.

Detailed

Project

Design

Comprehensi ve, well

structured, and detailed

explanation

with strong

justifications.

Well-organised with relevant

information but may have minor gaps in

explanation.

Meets basic requirements but lacks

clarity,

structure, or depth in some areas.

Covers

essential

elements but is

disorganised, incomplete, or lacking strong justifications.

Poorly

structured,

missing

details, or

lacks clear

diagram. Does not meet

expectations.

References & Presentation

Fully adheres to the template, with at least

three high

quality

references per student.

Follows the

template but

may have minor issues with

formatting or

reference

quality.

Includes

references

but lacks

consistency, quality, or

proper

formatting.

Incomplete

references,

weak

formatting, or not fully

aligned with

the template.

Missing or very poor

references,

incorrect

formatting, or does not

follow the

template.

Industry

Client

Information

HURDLE

This is a mandatory requirement; students must submit the industry client details, including the signatures of both the client and, if different, the contact person.

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT TASK

Standards of Conduct for Student Project [HURDLE] This is a mandatory task where students are required to complete and sign the Standards of Conduct for Student Project form. You can find the form at the bottom of this page. Ensure you sign it and submit it on Moodle by the end of Week 1, Sunday. Failing to submit on time will result in a 10% penalty for Assignment 1. If the submission is not received by the Assignment 1 due date, a score of 0 will be assigned. It’s essential to note that Assessment 1 will not be graded without the submission of this Standards of Conduct.

Participation (Week 1-3) [66.67% Mark] Attendance and active participation in lectures and tutorials are mandatory for the individual component MN692. Punctuality is of utmost importance in this unit. Students are granted a 10-minute grace period; however, beyond this timeframe, a comment (instead of a checkmark) will be noted on their AMS attendance record. It is required that students provide a screenshot of their attendance for the lectures and tutorial from Weeks 1 to 3. Each recorded attendance contributes to a total of 6 marks, accounting for 66.67% of the total individual assignment marks.

SPARKPLUS Self and Peer Assessment (Week 1-3) [33.33% Mark] SPARKPLUS is an essential tool for Self & Peer Assessment and Feedback in the context of group assignments, accessible at. Completion of this task is mandatory for all students, and the SPARKPLUS score directly contributes to determining the final assignment mark, especially for this specific section. The SPARKPLUS website calculates this score promptly upon completion of the review task by all group members. The system automatically generates the score once all group members have completed their reviews. Final scores will be reviewed and moderated by the tutor or lecturer, taking into account each student’s weekly progress and individual contributions during lectures and tutorials.

Familiarise yourself with the usage of SPARKPLUS by referring to the Student’s SPARKPLUS Guideline located in the assignment folder. Ensure that you provide comments justifying your rating, as a 50% penalty mark will be imposed if adequate comments are not provided for this section. It is crucial to emphasise that failure to submit the SPARKPLUS review will result in a zero mark for this section. Additionally, capture a full-screen screenshot demonstrating the completion of your rating; an alert will pop up upon finishing the rating after hitting the final save button. This section will contribute to 3 total marks (33.33% of individual marks).

Note that the combined total of 6 marks from attendance and 3 marks from the SPARKPLUS assessment will be proportionally scaled to a final score of 1, where 1 represents 100% of the individual assignment mark. The final student mark will be calculated as:

Final Mark = Group Report Mark × Individual Report Mark.

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MARKING CRITERIA

Section	Description	Marks (%)
Standards of Conduct for Student Project	• Sign the Standards of Conduct for Student Project. • Submit it by the specified deadline on Sunday of Week 1; a 10% penalty for Assessment 1 will be applied to late submission. • No marks will be awarded for Assessment 1 if submitted after the due date of Assessment 1.	HURDLE
Participation (Weeks 1-3)	• Ensure punctual attendance for all lectures and tutorials. • Provide screenshots of attendance records for Weeks 1-3 at the weekly lectures and tutorials, as recorded on AMS.	66.67%
SPARKPLUS Self & Peer Assessment (Weeks 1-3)	• Complete the SPARKPLUS Self and Peer Assessment with justified ratings. • Submit a full-screen screenshot as proof of completion. • Failure to justify ratings incurs a 50% penalty, and non submission results in a zero mark. • Your score is based on team evaluations, moderated by the lecturer and tutor based on weekly progress and individual contributions during lectures and tutorials.	33.33%
Total		100% (1)

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MARKING RUBRIC

Grades

>=80%

High Distinction

70%-79%

Distinction

60% – 69%

Credit

50% – 59%

Pass

<50%

Fail

Standards of Conduct for Student

Project or

Practical

Placement

HURDLE

A 10% penalty will be applied for late submissions of Assessment 1 from Week 1 to Week 3. No marks will be awarded for Assessment 1 if submitted after Week 3.

Participation (Weeks 1-3)

Punctual

attendance for all lectures

and tutorials.

Generally

punctual

attendance

for most

lectures and

tutorials.

Attendance

for lectures

and tutorials is somewhat inconsistent; punctuality

needs

improvement.

Inconsistent attendance

for lectures

and tutorials with frequent tardiness.

Poor

attendance

and

punctuality for lectures and

tutorials.

SPARKPLUS Self & Peer

Assessment (Weeks 1-3)

Exceptional

self

awareness,

insightful peer evaluation,

constructive

feedback,

strong

teamwork

capability, and critical

thinking.

Strong self

awareness,

thoughtful

peer

evaluation,

relevant

feedback,

good

teamwork

capability, and solid critical thinking.

Moderate

self

awareness,

reasonable

peer

evaluation,

basic

feedback,

satisfactory

teamwork

capability, and some critical thinking.

Limited self

awareness,

basic peer

evaluation,

minimal

feedback,

adequate

teamwork

capability, and minimal

critical

thinking.

Lacks self

awareness,

minimal peer evaluation, no feedback,

poor

teamwork

capability, and no critical

thinking.

Standards of Conduct for Student Project

I, [Your Name], am undertaking in an industry-based project or placement to gain insights into the workplace environment or business operations. Recognising my role as a student at [Your Institution], I acknowledge the necessity to adhere to the following standards of appropriate workplace conduct during my time on the job.

a. I will perform all work allocated to me to the best of my abilities.

b. I will be punctual and conscientious in the fulfilling of my project responsibilities. c. I will conduct myself in a respectful, courteous, and cooperative manner.

d. I will discuss any concerns, issues, or suggestions with my project supervisor or team. e. I will follow all project guidelines, including timelines, documentation, and team agreements. f. I will notify my supervisor or team promptly if I am unable to attend a meeting or complete a task on time.

g. I will attend all scheduled supervision meetings with the industry client and carry out project tasks as agreed with the team.

h. I will avoid behaviour that may disrupt the progress of the project, including unnecessary noise or distractions.

i. I will use communication tools and resources responsibly and professionally. j. I will respect team members’ input and provide constructive feedback.

k. I will accept guidance and supervision from the industry client or supervisor/tutor. l. I will refrain from bringing unrelated personal matters into project discussions. m. I will avoid discussing sensitive topics unrelated to the project that may cause discomfort to others.

o. I will contact my academic tutor at the Melbourne Institute of Technology (MIT) if I need help resolving any issues related to my project.

p. I understand that all intellectual property rights developed by me during the student project are assigned to and vest in MIT, and MIT may use these for academic or research purposes without providing credit to me.

q. I will keep any confidential information related to the project secure and not disclose it without permission.

Students are expected to uphold these standards in the same spirit as professional team members. If uncertain, always seek guidance from your project supervisor/tutor.

Signed: _________________________________________ Date: _______________________ Student’s Name

Check Now: MN691 Research Methods and Project Design Assignment Help