|
Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines
|
|
Trimester
|
T1 2026
|
|
Unit Code
|
MN692
|
|
Unit Title
|
Capstone Project
|
|
Assessment Type
|
Assessment 2 – Group Report and Individual Report
|
|
Assessment Title
|
Project Implementation and Evaluation
|
|
Purpose of the
assessment (with ULO Mapping)
|
Students should be able to demonstrate their achievements in the following unit learning outcomes:
a. Demonstrate the ability to conceptualise, research, design, plan and execute a substantial capstone project
b. Adapt and apply the knowledge and skills acquired over the core units of the course in planning and executing a capstone project in an area related to Networking
e. Demonstrate the application of knowledge and skills with a high level of personal autonomy and accountability while being part of a team-based working environment.
|
|
Weight
|
50% of the total assessment
|
|
Total Marks
|
100% equals the full 50 marks
Final Mark = Group Report Mark x Individual Report Mark
|
|
Word limit
|
N/A
|
|
Due Date
|
Group Report: Week 11, Sunday, 31 May 2026, 23:59 PM
Individual Report: Week 11, Sunday, 31 May 2026, 23:59 PM
|
|
Submission
Guidelines
Including the Use of Gen AI Tools
|
• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date.
• The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Roboto font, and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. The group written report must adhere to the provided template style.
• Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using the IEEE referencing style. • Late submission penalty: a penalty of 10% (of total available marks) per day, 0% score for more than 5 days late submission.
• Students must ensure before submission of the final version of the assignment that the similarity percentage as computed by Turnitin must be less than 10%. Assignments with more than 10% similarity may not be considered for marking.
• GENERATIVE AI USE IS PROHIBITED: The student is expected to complete this assessment without using automated tools.
|
|
Extension
|
If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly on AMS. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at:
|
|
Academic
Misconduct
|
Academic Misconduct is a serious offense. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description.
|
MN692 Capstone Project T1 Assessment 1 Assignment Help
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION
The MN692 Capstone Project builds on the work completed in MN690 Research Methods and Project Management from the previous trimester, but only if you retain the same group members in your tutorial session. If your team composition changes, you may be assigned a new topic and will be required to complete the project implementation accordingly. Please note that MN692 involves working with a real industry client, typically on a topic that aligns closely with your MN690 project.
The industry project report consists of two distinct stages. The first stage focuses on the project’s detailed design, while the second stage involves its implementation and analysis. Each stage requires the submission of both group and individual reports, contributing to Assessments 1 and 2.
Individual marks for each team member will be calculated for each assessment using the following process:
• Group marks for the written report will be assigned based on the group report assignment. • Each team member will receive an individual mark for the individual report assignment, which will be scaled by a factor of 1.
• The final mark for each student will be determined by multiplying the group report mark by this scaled individual mark.
• Failure to submit an individual report will result in a score of 0 for the student.
The group report must be submitted solely by the designated leader through the assigned group submission link. Individual reports should be submitted separately via the specified link. Only the assigned group leader is responsible for submitting the required files through the Moodle assignment submission link. Ensure that the full report is submitted, including all required contents starting from the cover page. Penalties will be applied in cases where multiple students submit highly similar files, as this may be regarded as plagiarism.
GROUP ASSIGNMENT TASK
In this phase, focus on completing Section 3 (Project Implementation) and Section 4 (Conclusion and Future Work) of your industry report. Additionally, finalise all remaining sections, from the Abstract to the required appendices. Ensure adherence to the final report template for proper structure and formatting.
Addressing Feedback on Assessment 1 [5% Mark] Revise your group assignment report of Assessment 1, based on the feedback provided by your tutor or supervisor. Make changes to all sections based on the given feedback as well as ensure the updating of all relevant appendices. Additionally, compile a summary of responses to the feedback received on Assessment 1 and include it in Appendix III. If there are no specific responses, conduct a comprehensive self-assessment of Assessment 1. Critically review it, identify potential areas for improvement, and then the team should provide comments on any enhancements made to Assessment 1 in the group assignment report.
Project Implementation and Evaluation [70% Mark] This section details the implementation and evaluation of the project. You must provide a comprehensive explanation of key aspects, covering both technical execution and project evaluation as follows:
• Implementation [25% Mark] Describe the project implementation using diagrams, explanations, and visual aids such as flowcharts and block diagrams to illustrate the design and functionality. Provide a step-by-step breakdown of the implementation process, from initial setup to full deployment. If simulations were conducted, specify the software used, input parameters, and underlying logic.
• Testing and Troubleshooting [10% Mark] Outline the strategies and methodologies used to evaluate the system’s functionality, performance, and reliability. Provide details on unit testing, system testing, integration testing, and user acceptance testing. Additionally, explain how bugs or issues were identified and resolved. At this stage, transparency is crucial. Ethical responsibility demands that any system failures or performance deviations be reported honestly. A system not performing as expected should not be viewed as a flaw or failure but rather as an opportunity to refine and improve its functionality.
• Results [15% Mark] Present the key findings and outcomes in this section. Use data, tables, graphs, or screenshots to support your results. Highlight whether the project met its objectives and expected performance criteria.
• Discussion and Analysis [10% Mark] Analyse the results by identifying patterns, trends, and discrepancies. Discuss the successes, limitations, and challenges encountered during implementation. Compare the findings with initial expectations, the literature review, relevant industry standards, or existing research.
• Innovation [10% Mark] Discuss the innovative aspects of your project, highlighting both group and individual contributions. Explain how the team collaborated to develop creative solutions, integrate new technologies, or improve existing methodologies. Describe any novel approaches used in system design, implementation, or problem-solving.
Conclusion, Limitation and Future Work [15% Mark] This section presents concluding remarks for the project, highlights limitations, and outlines potential avenues for future work.
• Conclusion [5% Mark] Summarise key findings and outcomes of the project. Highlight achievements and significant contributions.
• Limitation [5% Mark] Clearly articulate any constraints or shortcomings encountered during the project.
• Future Work [5% Mark] Suggest potential improvements, extensions, or research areas that can build upon this project. Identify opportunities for further development, optimisation, or real-world applications in the project domain
Reference and Presentation [10% Mark] Each student must provide at least five references from sources published within the past five years, following the IEEE reference style. Complete the remaining sections of the report, from the Abstract to all required Appendices. Carefully adhere to the final report template to ensure proper structure and formatting.
GROUP ASSIGNMENT MARKING CRITERIA
|
Section
|
Description
|
Marks (%)
|
|
Addressing Feedback on Assessment 1
|
• Revise Assessment 1 based on tutor/supervisor feedback. If no feedback is given, self-assess Assessment 1 and suggest improvements.
• Summarise Assessment 1 feedback or improvements in Appendix III.
|
5%
|
|
Project
Implementation and Evaluation
|
Implementation
• Provide a step-by-step breakdown of the implementation process from setup to deployment.
• Use diagrams, flowcharts, and block diagrams to illustrate design and functionality.
Testing and Troubleshooting
• Outline unit testing, system testing, integration testing, and user acceptance testing.
• Explain how bugs and issues were identified and resolved.
Results
• Present key findings and outcomes using data, tables, graphs, or screenshots.
• Highlight whether the project met objectives and expected performance criteria.
Discussion and Analysis
• Identify patterns, trends, and discrepancies in the results. • Discuss successes, limitations, and challenges during implementation.
• Compare findings with initial expectations, literature review, industry standards, or research.
Innovation
• Discuss the project’s innovative aspects, including group and individual contributions.
• Highlight creative solutions, new technologies, or improved methods in design, implementation, or problem-solving.
|
25%
10%
15%
10%
10%
|
|
Conclusion, Limitation and Future Work
|
• Concisely summarise key findings and project outcomes with clarity and precision.
• Identify and articulate limitations, constraints, and challenges encountered during the project.
• Propose specific areas for future work and development in the project.
|
15%
|
|
References &
Presentation
|
• Each student must provide at least five references from sources published within the past five years, adhering to the IEEE reference style.
• Follow the prescribed template presentation format, ensuring consistency from the Abstract to all required Appendices (Weekly Attendance Record, Meeting Logbook and Source Codes or Other Relevant Information).
|
10%
|
|
Total
|
100% (50)
|
GROUP ASSIGNMENT MARKING RUBRIC
|
Grades
|
>=80%
High Distinction
|
70%-79%
Distinction
|
60% – 69%
Credit
|
50% – 59%
Pass
|
<50%
Fail
|
|
Addressing Feedback on Assessment 1
|
Feedback fully addressed
with clear
improvements and
justifications.
|
Feedback
addressed with minor gaps.
Summary
included but
could be more detailed.
|
Some
feedback
considered, but response lacks depth. Limited
revisions
made.
|
Minimal
response to
feedback, with weak or
unclear
revisions.
|
No response to feedback, or little to no changes
made to
improve work.
|
|
Project
Implementati on and
Evaluation
|
Well
structured
implementa
tion with clear diagrams and a step-by-step breakdown.
Strong testing, results,
analysis, and innovation
showcasing
creative
solutions and industry
comparisons. Comprehensi ve and well
explained.
|
Clear
implementatio n with
diagrams and structured
testing.
Results and
analysis are
well-presented but lack depth in
comparisons. Innovation is
addressed but could be more detailed.
|
Basic
implementa tion with
minimal
diagrams.
Testing and results are
present but
lack clarity.
Discussion
and
innovation
are weak,
with limited connections to
expectations or research.
|
Limited
implementa
tion details,
missing
diagrams, and weak testing. Results and
analysis lack depth, and
innovation is barely
addressed or justified.
Needs
significant
improvement.
|
Poor or
missing
implementa
tion, testing, and results.
No clear
structure or
analysis.
Innovation is not
addressed.
Does not
meet the
assessment requirements.
|
|
Conclusion, Limitation
and Future
Work
|
Clear, concise summary,
articulate
limitations,
specific and
insightful
future work
proposals.
|
Well
summarised
findings,
identified
project
limitations,
plausible
future work
suggestions.
|
Adequately
summarised findings,
recognised
project
limitations,
basic future work
proposals.
|
Basic
summary,
mentioned
limitations,
general future work ideas.
|
Incomplete or unclear
summary,
minimal
limitation
identification, vague future work
suggestions.
|
|
References & Presentation
|
Fully adheres to the
template, with at least five
high-quality
references per student.
|
Follows the
template but may have
minor issues with
formatting or reference
quality.
|
Includes
references
but lacks
consistency, quality, or
proper
formatting.
|
Incomplete
references,
weak
formatting, or not fully
aligned with
the template.
|
Missing or
very poor
references,
incorrect
formatting, or does not
follow the
template.
|
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT TASK
Participation (Week 4-11) [66.67% Mark] Attendance and active participation in lectures and tutorials are mandatory for the individual component MN692. Punctuality is of utmost importance in this unit. Students are granted a 10-minute grace period; however, beyond this timeframe, a comment (instead of a checkmark) will be noted on their AMS attendance record. It is required that students provide a screenshot of their attendance for the lectures and tutorial from Weeks 4 to 10. Each recorded attendance contributes to a total of 16 marks, accounting for 66.67% of the total individual assignment marks.
SPARKPLUS Self and Peer Assessment (Week 4-11) [33.33% Mark] SPARKPLUS is an essential tool for Self & Peer Assessment and Feedback in the context of group assignments, accessible at Completion of this task is mandatory for all students, and the SPARKPLUS score directly contributes to determining the final assignment mark, especially for this specific section. The SPARKPLUS website calculates this score promptly upon completion of the review task by all group members. The system automatically generates the score once all group members have completed their reviews. Final scores will be reviewed and moderated by the tutor or lecturer, taking into account each student’s weekly progress and individual contributions during lectures and tutorials.
Familiarise yourself with the usage of SPARKPLUS by referring to the Student’s SPARKPLUS Guideline located in the assignment folder. Ensure that you provide comments justifying your rating, as a 50% penalty mark will be imposed if adequate comments are not provided for this section. It is crucial to emphasise that failure to submit the SPARKPLUS review will result in a zero mark for this section. Additionally, capture a full-screen screenshot demonstrating the completion of your rating; an alert will pop up upon finishing the rating after hitting the final save button. This section will contribute to 8 total marks (33.33% of individual marks)
Note: that the combined total of 16 marks from attendance and 8 marks from the SPARKPLUS assessment will be proportionally scaled to a final score of 1, where 1 represents 100% of the individual assignment mark. The final student mark will be calculated as:
Final Mark = Group Report Mark × Individual Report Mark.
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MARKING CRITERIA
|
Section
|
Description
|
Marks (%)
|
|
Participation
(Weeks 4-11)
|
• Ensure punctual attendance for all lectures and tutorials. • Provide screenshots of attendance records for Weeks 4-11 at the weekly lectures and tutorials, as recorded on AMS.
|
66.67%
|
|
SPARKPLUS Self & Peer Assessment (Weeks 4-11)
|
• Complete the SPARKPLUS Self and Peer Assessment with justified ratings.
• Submit a full-screen screenshot as proof of completion. • Failure to justify ratings incurs a 50% penalty, and non submission results in a zero mark.
• Your score is based on team evaluations, moderated by the lecturer and tutor based on weekly progress and individual contributions during lectures and tutorials.
|
33.33%
|
|
Total
|
100% (1)
|
INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MARKING RUBRIC
|
Grades
|
>=80%
High Distinction
|
70%-79%
Distinction
|
60% – 69%
Credit
|
50% – 59%
Pass
|
<50%
Fail
|
|
Participation (Weeks 4-11)
|
Punctual
attendance for all lectures
and tutorials.
|
Generally
punctual
attendance
for most
lectures and
tutorials.
|
Attendance
for lectures
and tutorials is somewhat inconsistent; punctuality
needs
improvement.
|
Inconsistent attendance
for lectures
and tutorials with frequent tardiness.
|
Poor
attendance
and
punctuality for lectures and
tutorials.
|
|
SPARKPLUS Self & Peer
Assessment (Weeks 4-11)
|
Exceptional
self
awareness,
insightful peer evaluation,
constructive
feedback,
strong
teamwork
capability, and critical
thinking.
|
Strong self
awareness,
thoughtful
peer
evaluation,
relevant
feedback,
good
teamwork
capability, and solid critical thinking.
|
Moderate
self
awareness,
reasonable
peer
evaluation,
basic
feedback,
satisfactory
teamwork
capability, and some critical thinking.
|
Limited self
awareness,
basic peer
evaluation,
minimal
feedback,
adequate
teamwork
capability, and minimal
critical
thinking.
|
Lacks self
awareness,
minimal peer evaluation, no feedback,
poor
teamwork
capability, and no critical
thinking.
|
Leave A Comment