PRJ5002 Enterprise and Resource Planning Trimester 3 Assignment Help

Assessment Overview

AssessmentTask	Type	Weight	Length	Due	ULOs Assessed
Assessment 1: Weekly Quizzes	Individual	30%	20 mins	Week	ULO1
Weekly quiz of key content areas			each	2-	ULO3
	Invigilated		(equiv. 3000	Week 10
	Invigilated		words)
Assessment 2: Applied Project Report (Project Management Plan) This assessment requires students to work in groups and analyse a real-life project to develop and writer a report of HR, Communication and Stakeholdersplan	Group	25%	3000 words	Week 9	ULO2 ULO3 ULO4 ULO5
Assessment 3: Applied Project Report	Individual	10%	15 mins	Week	ULO2
Presentation			(equiv.	10	ULO3
This assessment requires students to present their report from Assignment 2	Invigilated		1500 words)		ULO4 ULO5
Assessment 4: Case Study A case study related to project human resources, communications, and stakeholders with related questions will be provided. This assessment requires students to work individually on provided project case and answer the related questions with supporting from theliterature.	Individual	35%	2500 words	Week 12	ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4 ULO5

Assessment 1: Quiz

Due date:	Weekly (Week 2 – Week 10)
Group/individual:	Individual
Wordcount/ Time provided:	20minutes
Weighting:	30%
Unit Learning Outcomes:	ULO1, ULO3

Assessment 1 Detail

This quiz will assess your knowledge of key content areas (Week 1 to Week 10 contents) and to identify further support needs. For successful completion of the quiz, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, videos and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading materials. By completing this assessment successfully, you will be able to identify key aspects of Physical and Human Resources, Stakeholders and Communications in Project Management.

Assessment 1 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking Information: The quiz will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 30% of the total unit mark. 10-20 Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) will be used for each quiz. Individual quiz question marks will depend upon the total number of questions for each quiz. For example, 10 marks will be allocated for each quiz question if 10 questions are used for a particular quiz.

The Canvas System will instantly mark the answers of the quiz, but the results will be published later by the Unit Coordinator (UC). Average marks will be calculated based on the total number of quizzes (9) you must attempt. No Marking Criteria and Rubric will be used for this assessment task.

Assessment 2: Applied Project Report (Project Management Plan)

Due date:	Week 9
Group/individual:	Group
Wordcount/ Time provided:	3000words
Weighting:	25%
Unit Learning Outcomes:	ULO2, ULO3, ULO4, ULO5

Assessment 2 Detail

This assessment is designed to assess your individual and technical skills in planning and communicating a project effectively. Students are required to select a project case (either from the provided links to the real-life projects or a project case from an organisation of your selection). The project should be in the final stage of initial process, with either a signed off project charter or in the stage of getting the approval of the project charter. Students are required to write a report of Human Resource, Communications and Stakeholder Management Plan and pertinent subsidiary plans.

This report should include:

An introduction to the organisation and project, program, or portfolio case.
Aa stakeholders’ register.
A brief project charter.
Project HR Management Plan that includes Roles, Responsibilities, Authority and Competencies.
Project Organisation Charts.
Staffing Management Plan, Staff acquisition.
Resource calendars.
Staff release plan.
Training needs.
Recognition and rewards,
Compliance and Safety.

Project Communications Management Plan should include:

Communications Matrix.
Project Meeting Guideline (Schedules and Template for minutes of meetings (MoMs).
Project Reporting Procedure (Schedule and Template for Reports).
Project Management Information System (PMIS), and Glossaryof Common Terminologies.

Finally, Project Stakeholders Management Plan should include:

Stakeholder Analysis (Identification/Stakeholder Register).
Stakeholder Analysis (Power/Interest Matrix).
Stakeholder Analysis (Engagement Analysis).
Control Stakeholder Engagement.

For successful completion of this assessment, you are required to study the material provided (lecture slides, tutorials, and reading materials), engage in the unit’s activities, and in the discussion forums. The prescribed textbook is the main reference along with the recommended reading material. You are expected to discuss your work with the lecturer and to seek support.

Assessments 2: Marking Information

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 25% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown at the end of this document.

Assessments 2 Marking Criteria and Rubric

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 25% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.

Assessment 2: Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking Criteria	Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)	Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark)	Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)	Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark)	Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark)
Organisation and integration: use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope, and components. (15 marks)	Poor organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope, and components.	Satisfactory organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case scope and components.	Has good organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope, and components.	Has very good organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope, and components.	Has excellent organisation and integration; use of charts and graphs as per project management best practice, project case, scope, and components.
HR management plan including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Staffing Management plan including Resource acquisition and release plan, HR calendar and histogram, Staff induction and training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity, and inclusion. (25 marks)	Lacks evidence of knowledge to develop human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity, and inclusion.	Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity, and inclusion.	Good knowledge and skills base in developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity, and inclusion.	Very good knowledge and skills of developing human resource management plan and staffing management plan with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity, and inclusion.	Has excellent skills in developing human resource management plans and staffing management plans with the relevant components including Organisational Breakdown Structure (OBS), Roles and responsibilities, RACI matrix. Resource acquisition, HR calendar, Staff training plan, performance review, staff recognition and rewards plan, compliance, equity, diversity, and inclusion.
Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report. (25 marks)	Poor knowledge of relevant Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.	Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.	Has good Project communications requirements, Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.	Has very good Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.	Has excellent skills in Project communications requirements, Project Information Management System (PMIS), Project performance report.
Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders. (20 marks)	Lacks evidence of knowledge relevant to Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.	Evidence of basic knowledge and skills of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.	Good factual and/or conceptual knowledge and skills base in planning for methods of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.	Has very good knowledge and skills of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.	Has excellent knowledge and skills of Stakeholder identification, stakeholder analysis, power/interest matrix, stakeholder engagement analysis and control stakeholders.
Referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English. (15 marks)	Poor referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.	Satisfactory referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.	Good referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.	Very good referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.	Excellent referencing (Harvard), grammar, spelling, clarity of expression and use of standard English.

Assessment 3: Applied Project Report Presentation

Due date:	Week 10
Group/individual:	Individual
Wordcount/ Time provided:	15 minutes verbal presentation
Weighting:	10%
Unit Learning Outcomes:	ULO2, ULO3, ULO4 and ULO5

Assessment 3 Details:

In this verbal presentation, students are required to present their findings and recommendations about the case project. Students are also required to answer relevant questions asked by the lecturer/tutor during the presentation. The presentation must cover the topics and details of Assignment 2- Applied Project report.

Assessments 3: Marking Information

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown at the end of this document.

Assessments 3: Marking Criteria and Rubric

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 10% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.

Assessment 3 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking Criteria	Not satisfactory (0-49%) of the criterion mark)	Satisfactory (50-64%) of the criterion mark	Good (65-74%) of the criterion mark	Very Good (75-84%) of the criterion mark	Excellent (85-100%) of the criterion mark
Presentation slides	There are too many errors in	There are many errors in	There are some errors in	There are few errors in	There are no errors in
Visual Appeal (20 marks)	spelling, grammar and	spelling, grammar and	spelling, grammar and	spelling, grammar and	spelling, grammar and
	punctuation. The slides were	punctuation. Too much	punctuation. Too much	punctuation. Too much	punctuation. Information is
	difficult to read, and slides	information was contained	information on more than	information on two or more	clear and concise on each
	contained information copied	on many slides.	three or more slides.	slides.	slide. Presentation is
	onto them from another source.	Minimal effort made to make	Presentation has good visual	Presentation has significant	Visually appealing/engaging
	No visual appeal.	slides appealing.	appeal.	visual appeal.
Presentation topic	Presenters didn’t understand	The presentation was	The presentation was a good	The presentation was a very	Presentation was excellent
knowledge/content (30	topic.	informative, but several	summary of the topic.	good summary of the topic.	and shows extensive
marks)	The presentation was a brief	elements went unanswered.	Major information covered;	Almost all-important	knowledge of topic with
	look at the topic, but many	Much of the information	presentation contain some	Information covered;	comprehensive and complete
	questions were left unanswered.	irrelevant; coverage of some	Irrelevant information.	presentation contain little	coverage of information.
	Majority of information	of major points.		irrelevant information.
	irrelevant and significant points
	left out.
Presentation skills (30	Unsatisfactory presentation with	Satisfactory presentation	Good presentation with	Very good presentation with	Excellent presentation with
marks)	no clarity, appropriate pause,	with some clarity and pauses.	clarity and pauses in majority	clarity and pause and able to	clarity, pause, intonation and
	intonation and is not capable to		of speech.	engage listeners for most of	is capable to engage listeners
	engage listeners.			the time.	all the time.
Presentation preparedness (20 marks)	Evident lack of preparation/rehearsal Dependence on slides.	Simple presentation. Dependence on slides for most of the time.	Good presentation and dependence in slide are minimal	Very well prepared and go beyond what is presented in slide.	Extremely prepared and rehearsed.

Assessment 4: Case Study

Due date:	Week 12
Group/individual:	Individual
Wordcount/ Time provided:	2500 words
Weighting:	35%
Unit Learning Outcomes:	ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4 and ULO5

Assessment 4 Detail

Implementation of employee suggestion program: A case study of the Middle East health-care service company

Learning Outcomes

After studying this case, the students should be able to: explain the importance of employee engagement; illustrate the role of the participatory management style in an organizational context; discuss why managers may use engagement practices to operate effectively in businesses to lead change and innovation; identify the critical success factors, barriers and outcomes of employee involvement in driving high performance; and discuss the dilemma faced by the managers in the emerging economies while driving the momentum of excellence in the long run.

Students need to support their answers with further references to comprehensively address the questions in a critical manner. In addition, summary of recently published articles relevant to project human resource, communications and stakeholder management need to be added to the discussion where appropriate and relevant.

Assessments 4: Marking Criteria and Rubric

The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 35 of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.

Assessment 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric

Marking Criteria	Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)	Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark)	Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)	Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark)	Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark)
Identification and understanding of the case with justifications/ rationale. (15 marks)	The report does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the topic or provide a rationale for why it was selected.	The report demonstrates an understanding of the topic, and provides a rationale for why it was selected, however is unclear in places.	The report demonstrates a good understanding of the topic, and provides a rationale for why it was selected, however is somewhat unclear in places.	The report demonstrates a thorough knowledge of the topic and provides a rationale for why it was selected.	The report demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic and provides a clear rationale for why it was selected.
Identify and analyse of resource management, stakeholder management and communication management issues, problems, and failures as they apply to the case study and recommend appropriate course of action with emphasis on resource, communication and stakeholder management and lesson learnt. (25 marks)	Poor identification and analyses of resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and no/minimal recommendations of appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.	Satisfactory identification and analyses of resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and recommendations of appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.	Good identification and analyses of resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and good recommendations of appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.	Very good identification and analyses of resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and recommendations appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.	Excellent identification and analyses on resource, communication and stakeholder management issues, problems and failures as applied to the case study and recommendations appropriate course of action with emphasis on stakeholder, communication and human resource management and lesson learnt.
Evaluation of the literature. (15 marks)	The evaluation of the literature does not provide clear background information about the topic or cite relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay.	The evaluation of the literature provides background information about the topic, but is limited, and a wider reading, citing more relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay was required.	The evaluation of the literature provides background information about the topic, but a slightly wider reading, citing more relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay was required.	The evaluation of the literature provides background information about the topic, citing relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay.	The evaluation of the literature provides clear background information about the topic, citing highly relevant sources that will be analysed in the proposed essay.
Explanation about the notable resource, stakeholder, or communication management practices at the case organisation. (15 marks)	Poor identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, or communication management practices at the case organisation.	Satisfactory identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, or communication management practices at the case organisation.	Good identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, and communication management practices at the case organisation.	Very good identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, and communication management practices at the case organisation.	Excellent identification and explanation of the notable resource, stakeholder, and communication management practices at the case organisation.
Quality of critical analysis. (15 marks)	The critical analysis, arguments, points, opinions, and future predictions are poor or absent, and not supported by relevant evidence.	Critical analysis is adequate, and is supported by some evidence, however the arguments, points, opinions, and future predictions are unclear, and a wider range of evidence is required.	Critical analysis is good, and is supported by range evidence, with some clear arguments, articulated points, and opinions and future predictions to form conclusions. However, the analysis is unclear in places, and a slightly wider range of evidence is required.	Critical analysis is thorough and is supported by a good range of quality evidence, with convincing arguments, clearly articulated points, and balanced opinions and future predictions to form conclusions.	Critical analysis is sophisticated and nuanced and is well supported by an impressive range of quality evidence, with convincing and justified arguments, clearly articulated points, and balanced opinions and future predictions to form conclusions.
Writing, structure, and presentation. (10 marks)	There are many structural, wording, spelling and grammatical issues.	The ideas are written in a reasonably clear manner, however there are some structural, wording, spelling and grammatical issues.	The ideas are written and structured in a clear manner, with only minor wording, spelling and grammatical issues.	The ideas are written and structured in a very clear manner, with no wording, spelling or grammatical issues.	The ideas are written and structured with excellent clarity and cohesion, with no wording, spelling or grammatical issues.
Referencing in Harvard Style. (5 marks)	There are many errors with the referencing in Harvard style with in-text citations and the reference list.	Referencing is used, although there are some errors with in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.	Referencing is used appropriately, with only minor errors with in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.	Referencing is used appropriately, with no errors with in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.	Referencing is excellently used, with correct in-text citations and the reference list in Harvard style.