Cyber Security Governance and Management (ICT705) Assignment Help

Weightage: 20% 

Project Submission deadline: Session 12/13 

Final Presentation (Group activity) (Hurdle)

The purpose of project is to assess students on the following Learning Outcomes: 

LO 1 Review and research information security governance, compliance, and government regulatory  practices. 

LO 2 Investigate and evaluate appropriate cybersecurity policies, procedures, guidelines, and governance  structure in an organisational context. 

LO 3 Conduct risk analysis and explore possible solutions that include the cost, complexity of  implementation including appropriate authentication methods for user access, risks, threats,  vulnerabilities, and attacks that consider the impact to stakeholders. 

LO 4 Create and plan a contingency solution for an organisation to ensure disaster recovery, business  continuity and incident response availability. 

Assignment Overview: 

The presentation should be based on the report your group developed. Each group will be given 30 minutes times to present. 

The presentation schedule will be announced by the lecturer

A well-prepared PowerPoint presentation should be used. Maximum 15 slides can be  used. 

Each member from the group should have equal participation towards the  presentation.  

Practice the presentation as a group before the scheduled time to avoid mix-up.

Marking Guide: 

Criteria No. 

Assessment item 

Marks

Structure Introduction/Body/Conclusion 

20

Content Technical Knowledge/Research/Methodology 

40

Delivery Language/Style/Presence/ Audience Engagement 

20

Visual Aids PowerPoint Slides. 

20

Marking Rubrics: 

Assessment  

criteria

Exceptional  

>=80%

Admirable 

70% – 79%

Creditable 60% – 69%

Acceptable 50% – 59%

Unsatisfactory  <=49

Criteria 1  

Structure  

Introduction/Body /Conclusion 

20 Marks

The  

presentation has a clear and  

coherent  

structure with  strong links  

between  

introduction and conclusion. 

Presentation  well concluded.  The conclusion  covers all key  points  

facilitating clear  understanding  by the audience.

The presentation  has a good  

structure with  links between  introduction and  conclusion. 

Topic is clearly  and accurately   

introduced.  

Objectives of the  presentation are  clear. Scope is  defined. 

Presentation is  concluded and  covered all key  points

The  

presentation  has a defined  structure with  some links  

between  

introduction  and conclusion. Presentation  concluded. The  conclusion  

addressed the  problem but  not summarised the key points  in the  

presentation.

The  

presentation  has some  

structure but  with no link  

between  

introduction  and conclusion. Presentation  not effectively  concluded.

The presenters  made little  

attempt at  

structuring the  presentation.  No logical  

structure. 

Presentation  not concluded.  Main points left  unfulfilled.

Criteria 2 Content  Technical  

Knowledge/Resear ch/Methodology 

40 Marks

Demonstrated  very good  

understanding  of concepts  

related to the  case study. 

Demonstrated  incredibly good  technical  

expertise.  

Methodology  very well  

defined

Demonstrated  good  

understanding of  concepts related  to the case study. Demonstrated  

good technical  expertise.  

Methodology  well defined

Demonstrated  satisfactory  

understanding  of concepts  

related to the  case study 

Demonstrated  adequate  

technical  

expertise.  

Methodology  reasonably  

defined

Demonstrated  some  

understanding  of concepts  

related to the  case study 

Demonstrated  some relevant  technical  

expertise. No  clear  

methodology

Failed to  

demonstrate  understanding  of concepts  

related to the  case study 

No relevant  

technical  

expertise  

demonstrated.  No  

methodology

Criteria 3 Delivery  Language/Style/Pr esence/ Audience  Engagement 

20 Marks

Audible and  

clear. An  

entertaining  

presentation. Very fluent and  exceptionally  good pace. 

Noticeably  

confident 

Not dependent  on notes. Does 

Audible and clear. Fluent and good  pace 

Confident 

Not dependent  on notes. Reads  from notes  

occasionally 

Good eye contact and body  

language.

Audible and  clear.  

Reasonable  

Pace. 

Confident 

Semi 

dependent on  notes. Reads  from notes at  some times. 

 

Some eye  

contact.

Audible but  

unclear. Pace  too rapid/slow Language is not  precise. Tense  and not  

confident. 

Dependent on  notes. Reads  from notes at  most times.

Inaudible and  unclear. 

Inappropriate  use of language. Very tense and  not confident. Too dependent  on notes.  

Always reads  from notes.


 

not read from  notes. 

Plenty of eye  contact and  

good body  

language. 

Excellent  

contribution to  the overall  

presentation

Good  

contribution to  the overall  

presentation

Satisfactory  

contribution to  the overall  

presentation.

Occasional eye  contact. 

Failed to  

provide  

appropriate  

answers to  

questions. 

Limited  

contribution to  the overall  

presentation.

No eye contact.  Failed to answer any questions. Insignificant  

contribution to  the overall  

presentation.

Criteria 4 Visual  Aids PowerPoint  Slides. 

20 Marks

Professionally  developed  

PowerPoint  

slides. Precise  and concise use  of text. 

Excellent and  coherent  

structure  

including the  title,  

introduction,  body,  

conclusion, and  references  

slides. 

Pages  

consistently  

numbered and  sequence  

graphically  

shown. Effective use of relevant  graphics 

All resources  referenced.  

Figure and table  captions  

properly labelled Heading and  sub-headings  labelled.

Well-developed  PowerPoint  

slides.  

Appropriate text  on all slides. 

Good structure  including the  

title,  

introduction,  

body, and  

conclusion slides. Pages  

consistently  

numbered.  

Several relevant  graphics Many  figure and table  captions. 

Some references  to resources  

used. Heading  and sub-headings labelled.

Satisfactorily  developed  

PowerPoint  

slides. Some  slides with too  much text. 

Some structure  including the  title,  

introduction,  and conclusion  slides. 

Pages  

numbered but  inconsistently. Few relevant  graphics. Few  figure and table captions. 

Few references  to resources Some heading  and sub 

headings  

labelled.

Poorly  

developed  

PowerPoint  

slides. 

Too much text  on the slides.  Poorly  

structured and  inconsistent  (font size). 

Pages not  

numbered 

No graphics or  irrelevant  

graphics 

Figure and table captions not  labelled at all.  No references  to resources 

Headings and  sub-headings  poorly labelled.

No PowerPoint  slides