Cyber Security Governance and Management (ICT705) Assignment Help
Weightage: 20%
Project Submission deadline: Session 12/13
Final Presentation (Group activity) (Hurdle)
The purpose of project is to assess students on the following Learning Outcomes:
• LO 1 Review and research information security governance, compliance, and government regulatory practices.
• LO 2 Investigate and evaluate appropriate cybersecurity policies, procedures, guidelines, and governance structure in an organisational context.
• LO 3 Conduct risk analysis and explore possible solutions that include the cost, complexity of implementation including appropriate authentication methods for user access, risks, threats, vulnerabilities, and attacks that consider the impact to stakeholders.
• LO 4 Create and plan a contingency solution for an organisation to ensure disaster recovery, business continuity and incident response availability.
Assignment Overview:
• The presentation should be based on the report your group developed. • Each group will be given 30 minutes times to present.
• The presentation schedule will be announced by the lecturer.
• A well-prepared PowerPoint presentation should be used. Maximum 15 slides can be used.
• Each member from the group should have equal participation towards the presentation.
• Practice the presentation as a group before the scheduled time to avoid mix-up.
Marking Guide:
Criteria No. |
Assessment item |
Marks |
1 |
Structure Introduction/Body/Conclusion |
20 |
2 |
Content Technical Knowledge/Research/Methodology |
40 |
3 |
Delivery Language/Style/Presence/ Audience Engagement |
20 |
4 |
Visual Aids PowerPoint Slides. |
20 |
Marking Rubrics:
Assessment criteria |
Exceptional >=80% |
Admirable 70% – 79% |
Creditable 60% – 69% |
Acceptable 50% – 59% |
Unsatisfactory <=49 |
Criteria 1 Structure Introduction/Body /Conclusion 20 Marks |
The presentation has a clear and coherent structure with strong links between introduction and conclusion. Presentation well concluded. The conclusion covers all key points facilitating clear understanding by the audience. |
The presentation has a good structure with links between introduction and conclusion. Topic is clearly and accurately introduced. Objectives of the presentation are clear. Scope is defined. Presentation is concluded and covered all key points |
The presentation has a defined structure with some links between introduction and conclusion. Presentation concluded. The conclusion addressed the problem but not summarised the key points in the presentation. |
The presentation has some structure but with no link between introduction and conclusion. Presentation not effectively concluded. |
The presenters made little attempt at structuring the presentation. No logical structure. Presentation not concluded. Main points left unfulfilled. |
Criteria 2 Content Technical Knowledge/Resear ch/Methodology 40 Marks |
Demonstrated very good understanding of concepts related to the case study. Demonstrated incredibly good technical expertise. Methodology very well defined |
Demonstrated good understanding of concepts related to the case study. Demonstrated good technical expertise. Methodology well defined |
Demonstrated satisfactory understanding of concepts related to the case study Demonstrated adequate technical expertise. Methodology reasonably defined |
Demonstrated some understanding of concepts related to the case study Demonstrated some relevant technical expertise. No clear methodology |
Failed to demonstrate understanding of concepts related to the case study No relevant technical expertise demonstrated. No methodology |
Criteria 3 Delivery Language/Style/Pr esence/ Audience Engagement 20 Marks |
Audible and clear. An entertaining presentation. Very fluent and exceptionally good pace. Noticeably confident Not dependent on notes. Does |
Audible and clear. Fluent and good pace Confident Not dependent on notes. Reads from notes occasionally Good eye contact and body language. |
Audible and clear. Reasonable Pace. Confident Semi dependent on notes. Reads from notes at some times.
Some eye contact. |
Audible but unclear. Pace too rapid/slow Language is not precise. Tense and not confident. Dependent on notes. Reads from notes at most times. |
Inaudible and unclear. Inappropriate use of language. Very tense and not confident. Too dependent on notes. Always reads from notes. |
not read from notes. Plenty of eye contact and good body language. Excellent contribution to the overall presentation |
Good contribution to the overall presentation |
Satisfactory contribution to the overall presentation. |
Occasional eye contact. Failed to provide appropriate answers to questions. Limited contribution to the overall presentation. |
No eye contact. Failed to answer any questions. Insignificant contribution to the overall presentation. |
|
Criteria 4 Visual Aids PowerPoint Slides. 20 Marks |
Professionally developed PowerPoint slides. Precise and concise use of text. Excellent and coherent structure including the title, introduction, body, conclusion, and references slides. Pages consistently numbered and sequence graphically shown. Effective use of relevant graphics All resources referenced. Figure and table captions properly labelled Heading and sub-headings labelled. |
Well-developed PowerPoint slides. Appropriate text on all slides. Good structure including the title, introduction, body, and conclusion slides. Pages consistently numbered. Several relevant graphics Many figure and table captions. Some references to resources used. Heading and sub-headings labelled. |
Satisfactorily developed PowerPoint slides. Some slides with too much text. Some structure including the title, introduction, and conclusion slides. Pages numbered but inconsistently. Few relevant graphics. Few figure and table captions. Few references to resources Some heading and sub headings labelled. |
Poorly developed PowerPoint slides. Too much text on the slides. Poorly structured and inconsistent (font size). Pages not numbered No graphics or irrelevant graphics Figure and table captions not labelled at all. No references to resources Headings and sub-headings poorly labelled. |
No PowerPoint slides |
Leave A Comment