Executive Leadership and Governance CW3 Assignment Help
Please use this document as the cover sheet for the 1st page of your assessment. Please complete the below table – the gray columns
|
Module Name
|
Executive Leadership and Governance
|
|
Programme Name
|
|
|
Student Reference Number (SRN)
|
|
|
Assessment Title
|
|
Please complete the yellow sections in the below declaration :
Declaration of Original Work:
I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my original work, researched, undertaken, completed and submitted in accordance with the requirements of BPP School of Business and Technology.
The word count, excluding contents table, bibliography and appendices, is ______ words. Student Reference Number: __________ Date: ______
By submitting this coursework you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding assessments and awards for programmes.
Please note that by submitting this assessment you are declaring that you are fit to sit this assessment.
BPP University reserves the right to use all submitted work for educational purposes and may request that work be published for a wider audience.
MSc Management Executive Leadership and Governance CW3
Coursework Assessment Brief
1. General Assessment Guidance
• Your summative assessment for this module is made up of this one submission which accounts for 100% of the marks
• Please note late submissions will not be marked.
• You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted.
• For coursework, the submission word limit is 5,000 words. You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit LESS than 5,000 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can be found on your programme home page and the coursework submission page.
• Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking process.
• A total of 100 marks are available for this module assessment, and you are required to achieve a minimum 50% to pass this module.
• You are required to use only the Harvard Referencing System in your submission. Any content which is already published by another author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism.
You can find further information on Harvard Referencing in the online library on the VLE. You can use the following link to access this information:
• BPP University has a strict policy regarding the authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and MOPP which are available on VLE in the Academic registry section.
• You should include a completed copy of the Assignment Cover sheet. Any submission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked.
2. Assessment Brief
A large investment firm is considering making a significant investment in one of the following automobile manufacturers:
– Volkswagen AG.
– TATA Motors Limited.
– General Motors Company.
As part of their due diligence, they hired you as a management consultant to evaluate different aspects of one of the companies listed above, covering Executive Leadership and Corporate Governance.
The investment firm has asked you to produce a report, which will have a considerable impact on the firm’s investment decision, so you are expected to be diligent in your analysis and to offer an insightful evaluation of the company.
Please note you are NOT required to make recommendations or advice in your report about whether to invest. This will be solely the investor’s decision after evaluating all the due diligence information obtained.
Please select only one company from the above three when attempting the tasks below.
Task 1 – Leadership and Management (LO1)
– Critically evaluate the Leadership and management styles at the company using relevant academic models.
Conduct independent research into your chosen company and support your arguments with academic literature and the appropriate application of relevant leadership and management models.
Task 2 – Corporate Governance and Regulation (LO4)
– Discuss the different governance rules, practices, and processes (collectively known as the Corporate Governance Framework) at the company that ensure that it meets the interests of its shareholders.
Conduct independent research and refer to relevant academic literature.
Ensure that you identify the internal governance mechanisms and the external governance rules and regulations and demonstrate how the company applies and complies with them to meet shareholder interests. Depending on your company of choice, these might include some of the following:
– The SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), the Securities and Exchange Act in the USA, and the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.
– BaFin (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority), and the German Corporate Governance Code (Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex).
– SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India), the Listing Agreement of the Indian Stock Exchange.
Task 3 – Risk Management (LO3)
– Analyze three significant risks that the company faces and recommend appropriate responses to each of these risks.
Conduct independent research into your company of choice and ensure that your analysis and recommendations are specific to the company.
For higher marks, use and apply relevant risk management models and frameworks such as the Three Horizon Model, Risk Heat Maps, or the 4T’s Process. Explain how you used the models to identify and analyze the risks and to offer your recommendations.
As part of your recommendations, explain what role the board of directors plays in the risk management process at the organization.
Task 4 – Ethical Leadership (LO2)
– Discuss at least one significant ethical business challenge that the company faces and provide ethical leadership recommendations on how the company can address and manage this ethical challenge.
Conduct independent research and explain why the challenge(s) you discuss are considered ethical, by analyzing their impact on the company and its stakeholders. Ensure that your recommendations are targeted at the company’s top management and leadership.
For higher marks, use and apply a relevant ethical leadership model or framework such as the Triple Bottom Line.
Task requirements continue on the next page.
Presentation and Structure
– Clear structure and layout
– Writing style: professional and concise
– Appropriate Harvard referencing: range and credibility of the sources used and correct application of Harvard referencing style throughout the report and appendices.
Do NOT include an executive summary, introduction, or conclusion.
Please attempt all tasks. In order to pass in this module, you need to achieve a Pass in all four tasks. Your report structure should include the following sections:
Cover page (University cover sheet)
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations (if appropriate)
Task 1- Leadership and Management (LO1)
Task 2 – Corporate Governance and Regulation (LO4)
Task 3 – Risk Management (LO3)
Task 4 – Ethical Leadership (LO2)
References
Appendix (if appropriate)
Suggested Word Count Guide
|
Task 1- Leadership and Management
|
1,250 Words
|
|
Task 2 – Corporate Governance and Regulation
|
1,250 Words
|
|
Task 3 – Risk Management
|
1,250 Words
|
|
Task 4 – Ethical Leadership
|
1,250 Words
|
|
Total
|
5,000 Words
|
The word count applies to the main body of the report only i.e., the cover page, table of content, list of abbreviations, references, and appendices are not part of the 5,000-words count.
3. Marking Guide
|
Learning Outcome
|
Fail
|
Marginal Fail
|
Pass
|
Merit
|
Distinction
|
High Distinction
|
|
0% – 39%
|
40% – 49%
|
50% – 59%
|
60% – 69%
|
70% – 79%
|
80% – 100%
|
|
LO1: Develop your knowledge of
critical leadership capability in
leading
organizations
(Task 1)
|
Weak or
inadequate
knowledge of
critical
leadership
capability in
leading
organizations. Weak or no
evaluation of
the company’s leadership and management
style. Weak or inadequate
research and
analysis of the company’s
leadership and management.
|
Limited knowledge of critical leadership
capability in leading organizations. Limited evaluation of the
company’s leadership and management
style. Limited
research and analysis of the company’s
leadership and
management.
|
Satisfactory
knowledge and understanding of critical leadership capability in
leading
organizations.
Satisfactory
evaluation of the company’s
leadership and
management
style. Some
research and
analysis, of the
company’s
leadership and
management.
|
Good level of
knowledge and
understanding of
critical leadership capability in leading organizations. A
good critical
evaluation of the
company’s
leadership and
management style, with some discussion of the strengths and weakness of the
company’s
leadership and
management. Good application of
relevant leadership and management models to the
company. Evidence based analysis of the company’s
|
Excellent knowledge and understanding of critical leadership capability in leading organizations. An excellent critical
evaluation of the
company’s
leadership and
management style, that objectively
weighs the strengths and weakness of the company’s
leadership and
management. An
excellent and
detailed application of relevant
leadership and
management models to the company.
Excellent evidence backed analysis of
|
Outstanding
knowledge and
understanding of
critical leadership capability in leading organisations. An outstanding critical evaluation of the
company’s
leadership and
management style, that objectively
weighs all the
strengths and
weakness of the
company’s
leadership and
management. An
outstanding and
extensive application of relevant
leadership and
management models to the company.
|
|
|
|
|
leadership and
management.
|
the company’s
leadership and
management.
|
Outstanding and
extensive evidence backed analysis of the company’s
leadership and
management.
|
|
LO4: Critically
evaluate the
impact of the
governance and regulatory context on the success of an organisation (Task 2)
|
Weak or
inadequate
evaluation of
the impact of
the governance and regulatory context on the success of an
organization.
Weak or
inadequate
knowledge of
the Corporate Governance
Framework at the company. Weak or
inadequate
explanation of internal
governance in the company
and external
|
Limited evaluation of the impact of the
governance and
regulatory context on the success of an
organization. Limited knowledge of the
Corporate
Governance
Framework at the
company. Limited
explanation of
internal governance in the company and external governance rules and regulations.
|
Satisfactory
evaluation of the impact of the
governance and regulatory
context on the
success of an
organization.
Satisfactory
appreciation of the Corporate
Governance
Framework at the company.
Satisfactory
explanation of
internal and
external
governance rules and regulations. Some discussion on how the
company
|
Good evaluation of the impact of the governance and
regulatory context on the success of an organization. Good and clear
understanding of the Corporate
Governance
Framework at the company. Good
explanation of
internal governance in the company and external governance rules and
regulations. A good discussion on how the company
complies with these
|
Excellent evaluation of the impact of the governance and
regulatory context on the success of an organization.
Thorough and deep knowledge and
understanding of the Corporate
Governance
Framework at the company. Excellent and detailed
discussion of internal governance in the company and
relevant external
governance rules
and regulations that apply to the
company. An
excellent discussion
|
Outstanding
evaluation of the
impact of the
governance and
regulatory context on the success of an organisation.
Thorough, balanced, and deep knowledge and understanding of the Corporate
Governance
Framework at the company.
Outstanding and
extensive discussion of internal
governance in the company and
relevant external
governance rules
and regulations that apply to the
|
|
governance
rules and
regulations.
|
|
complies with
these rules and regulations.
|
rules and
regulations.
|
on how the company complies with these rules and
regulations.
|
company. An
outstanding and
extensive discussion on how the company complies with these rules and
regulations.
|
|
LO3: Critically
evaluate risk
management at a corporate level
(Task 3)
|
Weak or
inadequate
appreciation of critical
evaluation of
risk
management at a corporate
level. Weak or inadequate
analysis and
evaluation of
three risks
faced by the
company. Weak or inadequate recommendations for the
management of the risks
identified.
Weak or
|
Limited appreciation of critical evaluation of risk management at a corporate level, Limited analysis, and
evaluation of three risks faced by the
company. Limited
recommendations for the management of the risks identified. Limited discussion on the board’s role in managing these risks.
|
Satisfactory
appreciation of critical evaluation of risk
management at a corporate level. Satisfactory
analysis and
evaluation of
three risks faced by the company. Satisfactory
recommendations for the
management of the risks
identified. A
Satisfactory
discussion on the board’s role in
|
Good critical
evaluation of risk
management at a corporate level. A good and clear
analysis and
evaluation of three significant risks
faced by the
company. Good and appropriate
recommendations for the management of the risks
identified. A good discussion on the
board’s role in
managing these
risks. some
application of a risk management model or framework such
|
Excellent critical
evaluation of risk
management at a corporate level.
Thorough and deep knowledge and
understanding of risk management. A
thorough an
excellent analysis and evaluation of three significant risks faced by the
company. Excellent, realistic, and
appropriate
recommendations for the management of the risks
identified. An
excellent discussion on the board’s role
|
Outstanding critical evaluation of risk
management at a corporate level.
Thorough, balanced, and deep knowledge and understanding of risk management. An outstanding
analysis and
evaluation of three significant risks
faced by the
company.
Outstanding,
realistic, and
insightful
recommendations for the management of the risks
identified. An
outstanding
|
|
inadequate
discussion on
the board’s role in managing
these risks.
|
|
managing these risks.
|
as the Three Horizon Model or Risk Heat Maps.
|
in managing these risks. Excellent and detailed application of a risk
management model or framework such as the Three Horizon Model, the 4T Model or Risk Heat Maps.
|
discussion on the
board’s role in
managing these
risks. Outstanding and extensive
application of one or more risk
management modes or frameworks such as the Three Horizon Model, the 4T Model or Risk Heat Maps.
|
|
LO2: Apply your understanding of leadership
principles to key business
challenges (Task 4)
|
Weak or
inadequate
application of how an
understanding of leadership
principles can be applied to
key business
challenges.
Weak or
inadequate
knowledge
displayed of a significant
ethical
|
Limited application of how an
understanding of
leadership principles can be applied to key business challenges.
Limited knowledge displayed of a
significant ethical
challenge that the company faces.
Limited
demonstration of how this challenge impacts the company and its stakeholders. Limited
|
Satisfactory
application of
how an
understanding of leadership
principles can be applied to key
business
challenges.
Satisfactory
appreciation of a significant ethical challenge that the company faces. Some
demonstration of
|
Good application of how an
understanding of
leadership principles can be applied to key business challenges. Good and clear
evaluation of a
significant ethical challenge that the company faces.
Good demonstration of how this
challenge impacts the company and its stakeholders.
|
Excellent application of how an
understanding of
leadership principles can be applied to key business challenges. Thorough, and
balanced evaluation of a significant
ethical challenge
that the company faces. Excellent
demonstration of how this challenge impacts the
company and its
|
Outstanding
application of how an understanding of leadership principles can be applied to key business challenges. Thorough, balanced, and deep evaluation of a significant
ethical challenge
that the company faces. Outstanding demonstration of
how this challenge impacts the
company and its
|
|
challenge that the company
faces. Weak or no
demonstration of how this
challenge
impacts the
company and its
stakeholders.
Weak or
inadequate
recommendations on how the company can
address this
ethical
challenge.
|
or inappropriate
recommendations on how the company can address this ethical challenge.
|
how this
challenge impacts the company and its stakeholders. Appropriate
recommendations on how the
company can
address this
ethical challenge.
|
Appropriate
leadership-level
recommendations on how the company can address this
ethical challenge. Some application of an ethical leadership framework or model, such as the Triple Bottom Line.
|
stakeholders.
Excellent, realistic, and appropriate
leadership-level
recommendations on how the company can address this
ethical challenge. Excellent application of an ethical
leadership
frameworks or
model, such as the Triple Bottom Line.
|
stakeholders.
Outstanding,
realistic, and
insightful leadership level
recommendations on how the company can address this
ethical challenge. Outstanding
application of one or more ethical
leadership
framework or model such as the Triple Bottom Line.
|
|
Research Skills
|
Weak or poor research skills exhibited
through an
overreliance on some sources and limited use of academic
sources.
|
Limited research skills exhibited through the use of a narrow range academic sources –
and corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.
|
Satisfactory
demonstration of research skills
exhibited through the use of some academic sources – and corporate sources and
annual reports
where
appropriate.
|
Good demonstration of research skills
through the use of a somewhat broad
range of academic sources – and
corporate sources and annual reports where appropriate.
|
Excellent
demonstration of research skills
through the use of a broad range of
academic sources – and corporate
sources and annual reports where
appropriate.
|
Outstanding
demonstration of research skills
through the use of a broad range of
academic sources – and corporate
sources and annual reports where
appropriate.
|
|
Presentation and Structure
|
Weak
presentation,
inadequate
structure,
weakly
referenced.
|
Limited presentation and structure with inappropriate
references. Limited expression.
|
Presentation and structure are
satisfactory with full and
appropriate
references
(possibly limited in quantity;
largely correct
Harvard
referencing style). Structured layout and mainly
accurate
expression.
|
Presentation and
structure are good with precise, full and appropriate
references and
correct Harvard
referencing style. A good example of
structured layout and professional and accurate expression.
|
Presentation and
structure are
excellent with
precise, full and
appropriate
references
extensively used. An exemplar of
structured layout and professional and accurate expression. Inclusion of sources outside of the
prescribed course reading.
|
Presentation and
structure are
outstanding with
precise, full and
appropriate
references
extensively used. An exemplar of
structured layout and professional and accurate expression. Inclusion of sources outside of the
prescribed course reading.
|
Leave A Comment