BUS1006 Introduction to Business Law Assessment 2: In- Class Test Assignment Help

Assessment Overview

Weighting

40% of unit total

Due Date

Week 7 during the class.

Assessment Type

Individual assessment

Word Count /

Length

1000 words in one hour+ 10 minutes reading the question

Unit Learning

Outcomes

In this assessment, you will be tested on whether you have successfully met the  following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs):

ULO1: Discuss the Australian legal system and the legal context in which  businesses operate.

ULO3: Identify the laws that relate to establishing legal entities, and to the  formulation, operation, and termination of contracts.

ULO5: Analyse legal issues and problems as they apply to businesses and  recommend appropriate courses of action with emphasis on legal

precedent.

Submission Type  and Required

Format

The type of assessment you will be completing is a written test. It should include the  following:

• Face to face with pen and paper test

• Analyse the case scenario with specific rules and regulations

• To reach a solution of the given problem

• Exam paper hard copies submission.

Assessment Details

Assessment

Purpose

The purpose of this assessment is

• to improve the writing skills through legal analysis which they will learn from  Week 1-6 topics regarding the Australian legal system and Business law areas.

• its emphasis on critical thinking and requires students to apply these  skills to the identification and resolution of legal problems through  legal analysis and as they apply to business.

• This practise will help students to find out a solution of a legal problem.

 

Assessment

Instructions

In this assessment, you will need to complete the following steps:

1. In-Class test will be based on materials covered in week 1 -6.

2. Scenario based legal problems will be given to find out a solution  3. A list of Scenario based legal problems will be discussed during in class  workshop activities which will help students to prepare for the test.

4. Students need to follow the IRAC (Identification of Issues, Specific Rules, Application of the rules and Conclusion) methods to find out a solution. 5. Students will answer four questions out of five.

Artificial

Intelligence (AI) Use

In this assessment, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is NOT  PERMITTED. In this assessment, you must NOT use generative artificial intelligence  (AI) to generate any materials or content in relation to the assessment task.

This means you are NOT allowed to use any AI tools such as chatbots, text generators,  paraphrasers, summariser, or solvers to complete your assessment. You are expected  to produce your own work and cite any sources properly.

Engaging with AI tools for this assessment will be treated as a breach of academic  integrity. Refer to the Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for more details.

Other Important Information

Assessment

Resources

It is strongly recommended that you use the following to find academic peer-reviewed  sources of information.

• Legal Problem-Solving Writing Centre Learning Guide, University of Adelaide available at

• ECA Library catalogue and databases

• Unit Readings (Course Reserves)  For in-text citation and referencing, follow the ECA HE Student Guide to APA 7th Referencing.

Submission

Requirements

• Only face to face with pen and paper test. Exam papers hard copies should be  submitted.

Assessment

Support

For academic support or feedback on a draft of your assessment, please email  [email protected]

For assistance with finding resources, such as books and journal articles, please email  [email protected]

For information and guides on tackling assessments and developing your academic  skills, please visit in the ECA Library and Learning Support website:

For queries about this specific assessment task, please contact the Unit Coordinator.

 

Assessment X Rubric

Criteria (weighted as  indicated below)

High Distinction (HD)

85-100

Distinction (D)

75-84

Credit (C)

65-74

Pass (P)

50-64

Fail (F)

0-49

Criteria 1: Identify legal  issues, relevant rules and  their application in

resolving the issue (50%

Excellent identification  ion and analysis legal  issues and problems as  they are applied to

businesses and

recommendations of  appropriate courses of  action with emphasis on  legal precedent.

Very good identification  ion and analysis legal  issues and problems as  they are applied to

businesses and

recommendations of  appropriate courses of  action with emphasis on  legal precedent.

Good identification ion  and analysis legal issues  and problems as they are  applied to businesses and  recommendations of  appropriate courses of  action with emphasis on  legal precedent.

Satisfactory identification on and analysis legal  issues and problems as  they are applied to

businesses and

recommendations of  appropriate courses of  action with emphasis on  legal precedent.

Poor identification and  analysis legal issues and  problems as they are  applied to businesses and  recommendations of  appropriate courses of  action with emphasis on  legal precedent

Criteria 2: Answering the  questions through IRAC  methods (30%)

Explain almost all the  IRAC methods and rules. Has included high quality  answer to the questions.

Explain most of the IRAC methods and rules. Has  included high quality  answer.

Explain most of the IRAC  methods and rules. Has  included good answer.

Explain some of the IRAC  methods and rules. The  answer is not good.

The discussion on IRAC  methods and rules are  irrelevant. Poor quality  answers.

Criteria 3: Overall

structure (10%)

Structure, grammar,

quality)

Complete structure,  almost no errors in

language, appropriate  quality.

Most complete

structure, few errors in  language and

appropriate quality.

Reasonably appropriate  structure, some errors in  language and good

quality.

Scope for further

development,

understandable

structure and some

errors in language and  not proper quality.

Poorly prepared, poorly  understandable

structure and many

errors in language and  lack of quality.

Criteria 4. Referencing (10%)

Harvard formatting style  and citation of references  in the body of the report

All sources

acknowledged, and

proper citation applied.

Most sources

acknowledged, and

proper citation applied.

Sources are reasonably  acknowledged, and

proper citation mostly  complied.

At least half of the

sources are

acknowledged, and

proper citation complied.

Few sources

acknowledge d, and

proper citation mostly  not applied.