GDECE 102 Learning and Development Birth To Two Years Assessment 2 Rubric Assignment Help

Grade

Criteria

High Distinction

Distinction

Credit

Pass

Not Meeting Requirements

C1.

Explain your

understanding of  Bronfenbrenner’s  ecological

systems theory

(15 marks)

1.1

Bronfen

brenner’s

ecological

systems theory is  explained in

detail, with some  critical reflection.

1.2

Bronfen

brenner’s

ecological

systems theory  is clearly

explained.

1.3

Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems  theory is clearly

described.

1.4

Bronfen

brenner’s

ecological

systems theory  is accurately

outlined but

may lack detail.

1.5

Bronfen

brenner’s

ecological

systems theory is  outlined, may

contain minor

mis

understanding.

1.6

Bronfen

brenner’s

ecological

systems theory is  discussed but

contains key mis understandings  and/or

inaccuracies.

1.7

Bronfen

brenner’s

ecological

systems theory is  absent, or barely  mentioned.

C2.

Apply the theory  to analyze the

focus child in the  case study

provided.

(10 marks)

2.1

Child is clearly

introduced, and  ecological

systems theory is  applied to the

case with

detailed

explanation and  critical reflection.

2.2

Child is clearly  introduced, and  ecological

systems theory  is applied to the  case with

detailed

explanation.

2.3

Child is clearly

introduced, and

ecological systems  theory is clearly

applied to the case,  with relevant

details included to  support

understanding.

2.4

Child is clearly  introduced, and  ecological

systems theory  is clearly

applied to the  case.

2.5

Child is clearly

introduced, and a  clear attempt has  been made to

analyze the case  through

ecological

systems theory.

2.6

Discussion of the  child is brief, with  no reference to  the theory.

2.7

Discussion of the  child is either

absent or mostly  inaccurate.

C3.

Develop a range  of teaching and  learning

strategies to

address the

needs of the child

3.1

Teaching and

learning

strategies are

explained in

detail in terms of  ecological

3.2

Teaching and

learning

strategies are

clearly

explained in

terms of

3.3

Teaching and

learning strategies  are clearly

explained and

connected to the  analysis of the case.

3.4

Teaching and

learning

strategies are  clearly

described and

3.5

Teaching and

learning

strategies are

stated but may  not clearly

address the

3.6

Teaching and

learning

strategies are

noted, but

unclear or

irrelevant.

3.7

Teaching and

learning

strategies are

absent or mostly  inaccurate.

(15 marks)

systems theory  and connected to  the analysis of

the case. Critical  reflection on the  strategies

included.

ecological

systems theory  and connected  to the analysis  of the case.

meet the needs  of the child.

needs of the

child.

C.4

Relevant academic  literature is drawn  upon to support  explanations and  arguments

presented.

(5 marks)

4.1

A broad range of  academic

literature is drawn  upon to justify

argument

4.2

A broad range of  academic

literature is

drawn upon to

clarify argument

4.3

A range of academic  literature is drawn  upon to support

argument.

4.4

A range of

academic

literature is

drawn upon, but  only superficially  supports

argument.

4.5

Minimal academic  literature drawn  upon.

4.6

Academic

literature drawn  upon, but

irrelevant to target  content.

4.7

No literature

drawn upon or

literature drawn  upon is not from  appropriate

sources.

C5. Assignment is  formatted

according to

requirements and  written clearly and  cohesively. APA 7  referencing is used.  Word limit is

adhered to.

C4.1 The assignment is clear and free  of topographical and structural features  that hinder understanding. There is no  confusion between the author’s voice and  that of sources. The assignment is  formatted according to stated

requirements. The assignment is  formatted according to stated

requirements. Accurate mechanics of  in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing style were used.

Word limit met.

C4.2 The assignment  is clear with minor  typographical and

structural features  that may hinder

understanding. There  is minimal confusion  between author voice  and that of sources.  The assignment is

mostly formatted

according to stated  requirements.

Accurate mechanics  of in-text and end-of text APA (7th Ed.)

referencing style

C4.3 The

assignment is

clear with

typographical

and structural

features that may  hinder

understanding.  There is minor

confusion

between author  voice and that of  sources. The

assignment is

partly formatted  according to

stated

C4.4 The

assignment has

typographical and  structural features  that significantly  hinder

understanding.

There is confusion  between the author’s voice and that of  sources.

The assignment is  minimally

formatted

according to stated  requirements.

Mechanics of in

C4.5 The assignment has topographical  and structural features that prohibit  understanding. There is confusion  between the author’s voice and that of  sources, or the author’s voice is absent. The  assignment is not formatted according to  stated requirements.

Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA  (7th Ed.) referencing style were not used  appropriately.

Word limit not met.

(5 marks)

were used with minor  inconsistencies (no  more than 2 errors). Word limit met.

requirements.

Mechanics of in- text and end-of text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing style  were used with  inconsistencies  (no more than 4  errors).

Word limit met.

text and end-of

text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing

contain several

errors.

Word limit met.