GDECE 102 Learning and Development Birth To Two Years Assessment 2 Rubric Assignment Help

Grade 

Criteria

High Distinction 

Distinction 

Credit 

Pass 

Not Meeting Requirements

C1.  

Explain your  

understanding of  Bronfenbrenner’s  ecological  

systems theory 

(15 marks)

1.1 

Bronfen 

brenner’s 

ecological  

systems theory is  explained in  

detail, with some  critical reflection.

1.2 

Bronfen 

brenner’s  

ecological  

systems theory  is clearly  

explained.

1.3 

Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems  theory is clearly  

described. 

1.4 

Bronfen 

brenner’s  

ecological  

systems theory  is accurately  

outlined but 

may lack detail. 

1.5 

Bronfen 

brenner’s 

ecological  

systems theory is  outlined, may  

contain minor  

mis 

understanding. 

1.6 

Bronfen 

brenner’s  

ecological  

systems theory is  discussed but  

contains key mis understandings  and/or  

inaccuracies.

1.7 

Bronfen 

brenner’s 

ecological  

systems theory is  absent, or barely  mentioned.

C2.  

Apply the theory  to analyze the  

focus child in the  case study  

provided. 

(10 marks)

2.1  

Child is clearly  

introduced, and  ecological  

systems theory is  applied to the  

case with  

detailed  

explanation and  critical reflection. 

2.2 

Child is clearly  introduced, and  ecological  

systems theory  is applied to the  case with  

detailed  

explanation.

2.3 

Child is clearly  

introduced, and  

ecological systems  theory is clearly  

applied to the case,  with relevant  

details included to  support  

understanding.

2.4 

Child is clearly  introduced, and  ecological  

systems theory  is clearly  

applied to the  case. 

2.5 

Child is clearly  

introduced, and a  clear attempt has  been made to  

analyze the case  through  

ecological  

systems theory. 

2.6 

Discussion of the  child is brief, with  no reference to  the theory. 

2.7 

Discussion of the  child is either  

absent or mostly  inaccurate. 

C3.  

Develop a range  of teaching and  learning  

strategies to  

address the  

needs of the child

3.1 

Teaching and  

learning  

strategies are  

explained in 

detail in terms of  ecological 

3.2 

Teaching and  

learning  

strategies are  

clearly  

explained in  

terms of 

3.3 

Teaching and  

learning strategies  are clearly  

explained and  

connected to the  analysis of the case. 

3.4 

Teaching and  

learning  

strategies are  clearly  

described and 

3.5 

Teaching and  

learning  

strategies are  

stated but may  not clearly  

address the 

3.6 

Teaching and  

learning  

strategies are  

noted, but  

unclear or  

irrelevant.

3.7 

Teaching and  

learning  

strategies are  

absent or mostly  inaccurate. 

(15 marks) 

systems theory  and connected to  the analysis of  

the case. Critical  reflection on the  strategies  

included. 

ecological  

systems theory  and connected  to the analysis  of the case.

meet the needs  of the child. 

needs of the  

child. 

C.4 

Relevant academic  literature is drawn  upon to support  explanations and  arguments  

presented.  

(5 marks)

4.1 

A broad range of  academic  

literature is drawn  upon to justify  

argument

4.2  

A broad range of  academic  

literature is  

drawn upon to  

clarify argument

4.3 

A range of academic  literature is drawn  upon to support  

argument.

4.4 

A range of  

academic  

literature is  

drawn upon, but  only superficially  supports  

argument.

4.5 

Minimal academic  literature drawn  upon. 

4.6 

Academic  

literature drawn  upon, but  

irrelevant to target  content. 

4.7 

No literature  

drawn upon or  

literature drawn  upon is not from  appropriate  

sources. 

C5. Assignment is  formatted  

according to  

requirements and  written clearly and  cohesively. APA 7  referencing is used.  Word limit is  

adhered to. 

C4.1 The assignment is clear and free  of topographical and structural features  that hinder understanding. There is no  confusion between the author’s voice and  that of sources. The assignment is  formatted according to stated  

requirements. The assignment is  formatted according to stated  

requirements. Accurate mechanics of  in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing style were used. 

Word limit met.

C4.2 The assignment  is clear with minor  typographical and  

structural features  that may hinder  

understanding. There  is minimal confusion  between author voice  and that of sources.  The assignment is  

mostly formatted  

according to stated  requirements.  

Accurate mechanics  of in-text and end-of text APA (7th Ed.)  

referencing style 

C4.3 The  

assignment is  

clear with  

typographical  

and structural  

features that may  hinder  

understanding.  There is minor  

confusion  

between author  voice and that of  sources. The  

assignment is  

partly formatted  according to  

stated 

C4.4 The  

assignment has  

typographical and  structural features  that significantly  hinder  

understanding.  

There is confusion  between the author’s voice and that of  sources. 

The assignment is  minimally  

formatted  

according to stated  requirements.  

Mechanics of in 

C4.5 The assignment has topographical  and structural features that prohibit  understanding. There is confusion  between the author’s voice and that of  sources, or the author’s voice is absent. The  assignment is not formatted according to  stated requirements. 

Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA  (7th Ed.) referencing style were not used  appropriately. 

Word limit not met.

(5 marks)

were used with minor  inconsistencies (no  more than 2 errors). Word limit met.

requirements.  

Mechanics of in- text and end-of text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing style  were used with  inconsistencies  (no more than 4  errors).  

Word limit met.

text and end-of 

text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing  

contain several  

errors.  

Word limit met.