GDECE104 Professional Teaching Practice : Assessment 1
Assignment Help
GDECE104 Professional Teaching Practice 1: Assessment 1
(Report, 2000 words, 30% weight)
Task description:
Review empirical evidence of the role of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and physical development (birth to 2 years). What are the educational implications?
Report on empirical evidence related to the importance of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and physical development. Based on the report, draw the educational implications for the future teaching practice, and provide relevant examples in Early Childhood Education settings. Justify your report and the educational implications drawing on relevant academic literature, government reports and policy documents.
Criteria:
• Review empirical evidence of the importance of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and physical development, with focus on the age group of birth to 2 years.
• Draw the educational implications for future teaching practice, based on the review of empirical evidence of the importance of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and physical development.
• Provide relevant examples in Early Childhood Education settings.
• Justify your review and educational implications, drawing on relevant academic literature, government reports and policy documents. • The report is written clearly and cohesively, using academic English expression.
• The report is written using APA 7 referencing style and the word limit is adhered to.
Word count: 2000 (excluding references and appendix)
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: Monday, 22th July 2024, 11:59 PM
Extension requests must be granted in writing before the assignment due date. Contact your lecturer in writing for extensions of up to 7 calendar days. Longer extensions may be granted but require special consideration. Special consideration applications must also be submitted before the date and require documentary evidence, such as medical certificates.
Grading Scale:
|
Grade
Criteria
|
High Distinction
|
Distinction
|
Credit
|
Pass
|
N – Does not meet
minimum standard
|
|
C1.
Review of
empirical
evidence of the role of nutrition and exercise in
children’s health and physical
development
(birth to 2
years)
(10 marks)
|
C1.1
• Review of the role of nutrition and
exercise in children’s health and physical
development is
explained in detail
with in-depth
analysis
• Empirical evidence is provided and
relevant for children birth to 2 years.
|
C1.2
• Review of the role of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and
physical development is explained with general analysis.
• Empirical evidence is provided and relevant
for children birth to 2
years.
|
C1.3
• Review of the role of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and physical development is provided, but
general in nature with limited analysis.
• Empirical evidence is provided but not
specifically relevant for children birth to 2
years.
|
C1.4
• Review of the role of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and
physical development is provided, but some or
all require clarification. • Empirical evidence is provided but not
specifically relevant for children birth to 2 years.
|
C1.5
• Review of the role of nutrition and exercise in children’s health and physical development is not provided or
irrelevant.
• Empirical evidence is not provided or
irrelevant for children birth to 2 years.
|
|
C2.
Discussion of
educational
implication
(15 marks)
|
C2.1
• Educational
implications are
explained in depth
and details, with
relevant examples
provided
• The discussion is
drawing on a range
of relevant academic literature.
|
C2.2
• Educational implications are explained, with
relevant examples
provided
• The discussion is
drawing on relevant
academic literature.
|
C2.3
• Educational
implications are
explained in general,
with some relevant
examples provided
• The discussion is
drawing on relevant
academic literature.
|
C2.4
• Educational implications are explained in
general/superficial in
nature, with limited
examples provided
• The discussion is
drawing on limited
relevant academic
literature.
|
C2.5
• Educational
implications are not
explained or explained but irrelevant, with
limited or irrelevant
examples provided
• The discussion does not draw on
appropriate academic literature.
|
|
C3. Writing
format and
Referencing
(5 marks)
|
C3.1
•The assignment is clear and free of
typographical and
structural features that hinder understanding. •There is no confusion between the author’s voice and that of
sources.
•The assignment is
formatted according to stated requirements. •Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.)
referencing style were used.
•Word limit met.
|
C3.2
•The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder
understanding.
•There is minimal
confusion between the author’s voice and that of sources.
•The assignment is mostly formatted according to stated requirements.
•Accurate mechanics of in text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with minor
inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors).
•Word limit met.
|
C3.3
•The assignment is clear with typographical and structural features that may hinder
understanding.
•There is minor confusion between the author’s
voice and that of
sources.
•The assignment is partly formatted according to stated requirements.
•Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with
inconsistencies (no
more than 4 errors).
•Word limit met.
|
C3.4
• The assignment has typographical and
structural features that significantly hinder
understanding.
• There is confusion
between the author’s
voice and that of
sources.
• The assignment is
minimally formatted
according to stated
requirements.
• Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing contain
several errors.
• Word limit met.
|
C3.5
• The assignment has typographical and
structural features that prohibit understanding. • There is confusion
between the author’s
voice and that of
sources, or author’s
voice is absent.
• The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements.
• Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA
(7th Ed.) referencing
style were not used
appropriately.
• Word limit not met.
|
