GDECE108 Professional Teaching Practice Assignment Help
Task description:
Review empirical evidence of the role of the arts in young children’s development (3 to 5 years). What are the educational implications? How do you use arts learning experiences to enhance children’s learning in their early years?
Report on the empirical evidence relating to the importance of the arts in children’s early years development. Based on this report, analyse, and draw educational implications for teaching practice. Provide relevant examples in early childhood education settings. Justify your report and the educational implications drawing on relevant academic literature, government reports and policy documents.
Criteria:
• Review empirical evidence of the importance of the arts in children’s early years development, with focus on the age group of 3 – 5 years. • Draw the educational implications for teaching practice, based on the review of empirical evidence of the importance of the Arts in children’s early years development.
• Provide relevant examples in early childhood education settings by actively adapting the arts as pedagogical approaches. • Justify your review and educational implications, drawing on relevant academic literature, government reports and policy documents.
Word count: 2000 +/- 10%(excluding references and appendix)
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalizing all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: Wednesday, 7th August 2024, 11:59 PM
Extension requests must be granted in writing before the assignment due date. Contact your lecturer in writing for extensions of up to 7 working days. Longer extensions may be granted but require special consideration. Special consideration applications must also be submitted before the date and require documentary evidence, such as medical certificates.
Grading Scale:
Grade Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
N – Does not meet minimum standard |
C1. Review of empirical evidence of the role of the arts in children’s early years development (3 to 5 years) (10 marks) |
C1.1 • Review of the role of the arts in children’s early years development is explained in detail with in-depth analysis. • Empirical evidence is provided and relevant for children from 3 to 5 years. (8 – 10) |
C1.2 • Review of the role of the arts in children’s early years development is explained with general analysis. • Empirical evidence is provided and relevant for children from 3 to 5 years. (7 – 7.5) |
C1.3 • Review of the role of the arts in children’s early years development is provided, but general in nature with limited analysis. • Empirical evidence is provided but not specifically relevant for children from 3 to 5 years. (6 – 6.5) |
C1.4 • Review of the role of the arts in children’s early years development is provided, but some or all require clarification. • Empirical evidence is provided but not specifically relevant for children from 3 to 5 years. (5 – 5.5) |
C1.5 • Review of the role of the arts in children’s early years development is not provided or irrelevant. • Empirical evidence is not provided or irrelevant for children from 3 to 5 years. (0 – 5) |
C2. Discussion of educational implication (10 marks) |
C2.1 • Educational implications are explained in depth and details, with relevant examples provided. • The discussion is drawing on a range of relevant academic literature. (8 – 10) |
C2.2 • Educational implications are explained, with relevant examples provided. • The discussion is drawing on relevant academic literature. (7 – 7.5) |
C2.3 • Educational implications are explained in general, with some relevant examples provided. • The discussion is drawing on relevant academic literature. (6 – 6.5) |
C2.4 • Educational implications are explained in general/superficial in nature, with limited examples provided. • The discussion is drawing on limited relevant academic literature. (5 – 5.5) |
C2.5 • Educational implications are not explained or explained but irrelevant, with limited or irrelevant examples provided. • The discussion does not draw on appropriate academic literature. (0 – 5) |
C3. Provide relevant examples in Early Childhood Education settings by actively adapting the Arts as |
C3.1 Examples provided are relevant, and clearly target children’s learning and development needs. Examples provides effective |
C3.2 Examples provided are relevant, and clearly address children’s learning and development needs. Relevant implementation of the arts pedagogies is explained. |
C3.3 Examples provided are relevant, and address children’s learning and development needs. Implementation of the arts pedagogies is briefly explained. |
C3.4 Examples provided are relevant. Children’s learning and development needs are discussed but the discussion is superficial. Implementation of arts |
C3.5 Examples provided are unclear, missing, or irrelevant. Connection to children’s learning and development needs inaccurate or omitted. No |
pedagogical approaches. (5 marks) |
implementation of the arts pedagogies. (4– 5) |
(3.5) |
(3) |
pedagogies is noted superficially or not appropriate. (2.5) |
implementation of arts pedagogies is explained. (0 – 2) |
C4. Writing format and Referencing (5 marks) |
C4.1 •The assignment is clear and free of typographical and structural features that hinder understanding. •There is no confusion between the author’s voice and that of sources. •The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements. •Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing styles were used. •Word limit met. (4 – 5) |
C4.2 •The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. •There is minimal confusion between author voice and that of sources. •The assignment is mostly formatted according to stated requirements. •Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors). Word limit met. (3.5) |
C4.3 •The assignment is clear with topographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. •There is minor confusion between author voice and that of sources. •The assignment is partly formatted according to stated requirements. •Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors). Word limit met. (3) |
C4.4 • The assignment has typographical and structural features that significantly hinder understanding. • There is confusion between the author voice and that of sources. • The assignment is minimally formatted according to stated requirements. • Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing contain several errors. • Word limit met. (2.5) |
C4.5 • The assignment has typographical and structural features that prohibit understanding. • There is confusion between the author voice and that of sources, or author’s voice is absent. • The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements. • Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were not used appropriately. • Word limit not met. (0 -2) |
Leave A Comment