Objective
This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student presentation skills and to give students experience in researching a topic and writing a report relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter.
INSTRUCTIONS
Assignment 2 – Research Study – 10% (Due Session 9) Individual Assignment
For this component you will write a report or critique on the paper you chose from Assignment 1.
Your report should be limited to approx. 1500 words (not including references). Use 1.5 spacing with a 12 point Times New Roman font. Though your paper will largely be based on the chosen article, you should use other sources to support your discussion or the chosen papers premises. Citation of sources is mandatory and must be in the IEEE style.
Your report or critique must include:
Title Page: The title of the assessment, the name of the paper you are reporting on and its authors, and your name and student ID.
Introduction: Identification of the paper you are critiquing/ reviewing, a statement of the purpose for your report and a brief outline of how you will discuss the selected article (one or two paragraphs).
Body of Report: Describe the intention and content of the article. If it is a research report, discuss the research method (survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings. Comment on problems or issues highlighted by the authors. Report on results discussed and discuss the conclusions of the article and how they are relevant to the topics of this Unit of Study.
Conclusion: A summary of the points you have made in the body of the paper. The conclusion should not introduce any ‘new’ material that was not discussed in the body of the paper. (One or two paragraphs)
References: A list of sources used in your text. They should be listed alphabetically by (first) author’s family name. Follow the IEEE style.
The footer must include your name, student ID, and page number.
Note: reports submitted on papers which are not approved or not the approved paper registered for the student will not be graded and attract a zero (0) grade.
What to Submit
Submit your report to the Moodle drop-box for Assignment 2. Note that this will be a turn-it-in drop box and as such you will be provided with a similarity score. This will be taken into account when grading the assignment. Note that incidents of plagiarism will be penalized. If your similarity score is high you can re-submit your report, but re submissions are only allowed up to the due date. If you submit your assignment after the due date and time re-submissions will not be allowed.
Task | Excellent | Proficient | Satisfactory | Partially meets the expectation | Do not meet the expectation |
Report Layout | The report layout, structure and language are well presented. The title of the assessment is provided, the name of the article is, student id and student name are included 1points | The report layout, structure and language are appropriate. The title of the assessment is provided, the name of the article is, student id and student name are included 0.75points | The title of the assessment is provided, the name of the article is, student id and student name are included 0.6points | The name of the article is student id and student name are included 0.5points | The name of the article is student id and student name are not included 0points |
Introduction | The introduction provides a clear identification of the paper your critiquing/ reviewing, and a well articulated statement of the purpose for your report and a brief outline of how you will discuss the selected article 1points | The introduction provides identification of the paper your critiquing/ reviewing, and a well articulated statement of the purpose for your report and a brief outline of how you will discuss the selected article 0.75points | The introduction provides identification of the paper your critiquing/ reviewing, and a statement of the purpose for your report and a brief outline of how you will discuss the selected article 0.6points | The introduction provides identification of the paper your critiquing/ reviewing, and a statement of the purpose for your report 0.5points | The introduction does not provide, identification of the paper your critiquing/ reviewing, and does not provide an appropriate statement of the purpose for your report 0points |
Body | The body of report includes a very well written research method (survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings 4points | The body of report includes a well written research method (survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings 3points | The body of report includes a research method (survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings 2points | The body of report includes a well written research method (mostly covering survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings 1points | The body of the report does not include research method (mostly covering survey, case study, observation, experiment, or other method) and findings 0points |
Conclusion | The conclusion provides a very well written summary of all the points discussed in the body of the paper 1points | The conclusion provides a good summary of all the points discussed in the body of the paper 0.75points | The conclusion provides a summary of all the points discussed in the body of the paper 0.6points | The conclusion provides a summary of most of the points discussed in the body of the paper 0.5points | The conclusion fails to provide a summary of the points discussed in the body of the paper 0points |
References | The references are current, cited and follow IEEE Style 3points | The references are cited and follow IEEE Style 2.1points | The references are cited and mostly follow IEEE Style 1.8points | Most of the references follow the IEEE Style 1.5points | References not in IEEE Style 0.75points |