MSc Management Global Strategy and Sustainability Coursework Assessment Brief CW4
Please use the table below as your cover sheet for the 1st page of the submission. The sheet should be before the cover/title page of your submission.
Programme | |
Module name | Global Strategy and Sustainability |
Schedule Term | |
Student Reference Number (SRN) | |
Report/Assignment Title | |
Date of Submission (Please attach the confirmation of any extension received) | |
Declaration of Original Work: I hereby declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my original work, researched, undertaken, completed and submitted in accordance with the requirements of BPP School of Business and Technology. The word count, excluding contents table, bibliography and appendices, is ___ words. Student Reference Number: Date: | |
By submitting this coursework, you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding assessments and awards for programmes. Please note, submission is your declaration you are fit to sit. BPP University reserves the right to use all submitted work for educational purposes and may request that work be published for a wider audience. BPP School of Business and Technology |
MSc Management Global Strategy and Sustainability Coursework Assessment Brief CW4
Submission mode: Turnitin online access
1. General Assessment Guidance
• Your summative assessment for this module is made up of this Coursework and Presentation slides submission which accounts for 100% of the marks.
• Please note late submissions will not be marked.
• You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted.
• For the coursework, (Part A), the submission word limit is 3000 words. You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit LESS than 3000 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can be found on your programme home page and the coursework submission page. Part B – The presentation has no word limit but the limit for the number of slides is 8 – 14, including references and cover slide).
• Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking process.
• A total of 100 marks are available for this module assessment, and you are required to achieve minimum 50% to pass this module.
• You are required to use only Harvard Referencing System in your submission. Any content which is already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism.
• You can find further information on Harvard Referencing in the online library on the Hub (Found via Help & Support). You can use the following link to access this information:
• BPP University has a strict policy regarding authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and MOPP which are available on HUB in the Academic registry section (Found via Help & Support).
• You should include a completed copy of the Assignment Cover sheet. Any submission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked.
2. Assessment Brief
This module is assessed through one graded element worth 100%. You must achieve at least 50% to pass this module.
PART A – BUSINESS REPORT
In the role of a Management Consultant, you are invited by the CEO of Samsung Electronics to their headquarters. They have secured permission from Samsung Electronics Board of Directors (BoD) to review and upgrade their global strategies in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. In view of this background, you are required to undertake a strategy upgrade of Samsung Electronics and provide a business REPORT to the CEO on further growth opportunities and sustainability of this growth into Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia using the techniques and concepts covered in the module.
PART B – POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
In the role of a Management Consultant, you are required to design a short PowerPoint Presentation to the CEO of Samsung Electronics on how they can sustain their growth and profitability in the contemporary business environment. The models of Sustainability discussed on the module will be used.
This link provides information on Samsung Electronics:
IN ADDITION, STUDENTS ARE EXPECTED TO CONDUCT THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT RESEARCH ON THIS COMPANY.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANCY REPORT
PART A- Business Report (3000 words)
In the role of a Management Consultant, you are invited by the CEO of Samsung Electronics to their headquarters. They have secured permission from Samsung Electronics’ Board of Directors (BoD) to review and upgrade their global strategies in Europe, Africa, the Middle East and Asia. In view of this background, you are required to undertake a strategy upgrade of Samsung Electronics and provide a
business REPORT to the CEO on further growth opportunities and sustainability of this growth into Europe, Africa, the Middle East, and Asia using the techniques and concepts covered in the module.
Task 1. You are required to conduct an internal and external environmental analysis and then mention two sustainable competitive advantages to develop and support Samsung Electronics’ global strategy. (LO1).
Task 2. Based on your analysis in Task 1, suggest either possible entry strategies for new markets or ways to improve existing strategies. (LO2).
Task 3. Using the strategies suggested in task 2, evaluate how Samsung Electronics can implement the strategies to support its global supply chain. (LO3).
Guidelines
Guidelines for Task 1.
• For a pass, at least the MACRO Environment, the Industry Environment, and the internal Environment should be analysed. For the industry environment, a few sentences can be used to explore the forces making sure they are referenced using journals and other credible platforms like Statista, McKinsey and Mintel.
• Some threats and opportunities can be identified in the analysis of the MACRO environmental analysis.
• At most two (2) competitive advantages should be identified from the internal analysis and an application of how they can be developed and maintained (sustained) will be rewarded.
• Note that you cannot use SWOT analysis as the CEO needs a detailed and thorough understanding of each part of the business environment. One model can be used for each part of the environment analysis identified above.
• Support your arguments with academic literature and references to other similar real companies.
• To achieve a merit or distinction, you will be expected to demonstrate some critical evaluation of the environmental issues found in the research.
• An analysis of the motives of globalisation in relation to the organisation using a Model, for example YIP’s industry globalisation drivers is important.
• Analyse two (2) Strategic Option(s) for Internationalisation as a theoretical foundation to assist in deciding which three (3) Entry Strategies will support the organisation.
• Apply and evaluate three (3) Entry Strategies the organisation can use in entering the Global Environment using appropriate models and based on the Strategic Options you identified. The application of these theories to the global environment and the organisation will attract high marks.
• The application and originality shown in exploring the Strategic Option(s) and Entry Strategies logically and in detail is needed to attain a merit or distinction.
• Support your arguments with academic literature and references to other similar real companies.
Guidelines for Task 3
• An application of the models for the Supply Chain in relation to the global environment and the organisation is required. The use of models and their applications will be rewarded.
• The application of the models should show originality, creativity, and logic to attain a merit
or distinction. An extensive use of models/theories or dwelling on theories or a description of models will not attain high marks.
• You are required to use a model, such as the BCG Matrix or Porter’s 3 Essential Tests, to analyse how the organisation can increase profitability.
• An ability to creatively apply the models to show how the organisation can use them to increase profitability will be rewarded.
• Support your arguments with academic literature and references to other similar real companies.
Presentation and Structure
Word count: 3000 words
Your report structure should include the following sections:
Cover page (University cover sheet)
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations (if appropriate)
Introduction
Task 1 – The External and Internal Environment
Task 2 – Strategy in the Global Environment
Task 3 – Corporate Strategy
Concluding remarks
References
Appendix (The last one should be the PowerPoint Presentation)
Word count – only applies to the main body (shown in bold); i.e., cover page, table of content, list of abbreviations, references, assessment self-evaluation and appendix are not part of the 3000-word count.
Tip for Mapping the Assessment towards Module Topics and Module Learning Outcomes (LOs)
Assessment Task | Module Topics | Module LOs |
Task 1 – The External & Internal Environment | External Analysis – Opportunities and Threats Internal Analysis – Distinctive competencies, profitability, and competitive advantage | LO1: Critically analyse the internal and external business environment as sources of competitive advantage to facilitate a global strategy. |
Task 2 – Strategy in the Global Environment | Strategy in the Global Environment – profit growth through global expansion | LO2: Critically evaluate both strategic direction and strategic options in complex business environments. |
Task 3 – Corporate Strategy | Corporate Strategy – diversification, integration and outsourcing | LO3: Evaluate the implications of global strategy to management practice within a business environment. |
PART B- POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
Your PowerPoint presentation should contain the following: –
• Learning Outcome 4 – (LO4); Assess and apply suitable frameworks and ideas to formulate and control sustainability for organisations in a global context.
• Analyse Samsung Electronics’ Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) strategy and the key Ethical issues the organisation faces and make suggestions explaining how the challenges identified can be addressed.
Guideline Slides | Content |
Title of presentation Student SRN No Date | |
Agenda | |
Sustainability Use the Triple Bottom Line model/framework to analyse the sustainability position of Samsung Electronics’ and identify where there are short comings. | |
Use a framework such as Porter and Kramer’s (2006) Creating Shared Value and or the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to illustrate how Samsung Electronics can solve the lack of balance in the use of the Triple Bottom Line. | |
| Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Use Carroll’s pyramid of CSR to analyse the current CSR position of Samsung Electronics. |
Make suggestions using Johnsons 2017 Stances and or other appropriate frameworks on how Samsung Electronics can correct the short falls in the organisations CSR. | |
Ethics Outline some ethical dilemmas faced by Samsung Electronics presently or that the organisation is likely to face in the Global Environments indicated in the report. | |
Based on the outline, use models/frameworks such as the Stakeholder View, Governance issues and or the Principal – Agent principle to suggest ways in which Samsung Electronics can solve the Ethical dilemmas. | |
References |
Please add all PowerPoint slides at the end of your report, as part of the appendix. Please ensure that your PowerPoint slides are saved correctly within the appendix section and are visible. You can do this by taking SCREEN SNIP, PHOTOSHOOT or by COPYING/PASTING your PowerPoint presentation slides one after another within the appendix section of the report so that only one document in the form of the Report plus the PowerPoint presentation is submitted. Please discuss this with your class tutor and Module Leader should you require further clarity or guidance on this.
No hyperlinks will be accepted for Part B.
If you have any further questions about this coursework assignment, please contact the Module Leader or the tutor.
PART B – POWERPOINT PRESENTATION
Tip for Mapping the Assessment towards Module Topics and Module Learning Outcomes (LOs)
Assessment Task | Module Topics | Module LOs |
In the role of a Management Consultant, you are required to design a short PowerPoint Presentation to the CEO of Samsung Electronics’ operations on how they can sustain their growth and profitability in the contemporary business environment. The models of Sustainability, CSR and Ethics discussed on the module will be used. | Strategic Purpose – Sustainability | LO4: Assess and apply suitable frameworks and ideas to formulate and control sustainability for organisations in a global context. |
Marking Guide
Part A – REPORT Learning Outcome: | Fail (0-39%) | Marginal Fail (40-49%) | Pass (50-59%) | Merit (60-69%) | Distinction (70-79%) | High Distinction (80-100%) |
LO1: Critically analyse the internal and external business environment as sources of competitive advantage to facilitate a global strategy. | An Inadequate or Weak analysis of the external and internal environments using appropriate models. The analysis shows a weak understanding of at most, 2 competitive advantages identified in the environmental analysis and does not include how competitive advantage can be built and maintained Answers shows a very basic | Limited understanding of the external and internal environments of the organisation with limited analysing of the internal and external environment. There is limited understanding of at most, 2 competitive advantages identified in the environmental analysis and how these competitive advantages can be built and maintained. How the 2 | Satisfactory Knowledge of the external and internal environments of the organisation using appropriate models to analyse all parts of the environment with limited omissions. There are adequate indications of opportunities and threats acknowledged in the external analysis showing basic critical analysis or/and evaluation. There are adequate indications of how at least, 2 | A Good Knowledge of the external and internal environments of the organisation using appropriate models to analyse all parts of the environment with no omissions but limited appropriate critical evaluations of the metrics found in researching for the environment. There is a good analysis of opportunities and threats acknowledged in the external analysis showing | An excellent knowledge of the external and internal environments of the organisation using appropriate models in analysing these all parts of the environment with no omissions. Some critical analysis of the metrics found in researching the environment. There is an excellent application of opportunities and threats acknowledged in the external analysis showing its effect on business risk with some suggested remedies. | An outstanding knowledge of the external and internal environments of the organisation using appropriate models in analysing these all parts of the environment with no omissions. Some critical evaluation of the metrics. There is an outstanding application of opportunities and threats acknowledged in the external analysis showing its effect on business risk with some suggested remedies indicating which remedies are key with reason(s) There are creative indications of how at least 2 competitive |
understanding of the task | Competitive Advantages can be sustained is not demonstrated. | competitive advantages identified in the internal analysis are sustained, showing some limited understanding of relevant theories and their application. | its effect on business risk. There are at least, 2 competitive advantages identified in the internal analysis and how these might be maintained | There are creative indications of how at least 2 competitive advantages identified in the internal analysis can be sustained creatively and with some originality. | advantages identified in the internal analysis are sustained demonstrating originality in explanation and application.
| |
LO 2: Critically evaluate both strategic direction and strategic options in complex business environments. | An inadequate or weak analytical knowledge of how the organisation can enter the global market using appropriate models. The analysis lacks understanding of the motives influencing the organisation’s entry into the global market. There is limited or no analysis of at most, 2 strategic option(s) | Limited analytical knowledge of how an organisation can enter the global market using appropriate models. The analysis identifies but does not show, understanding of the motives for an organisation to enter the global environment. They were identified reasons for | A satisfactory analysis of how the organisation can enter the global environment using appropriate models. Analysis is limited and based on the motives for the organisation to operate globally. There is a satisfactory attempt to show at least, 2 strategic option(s) available to the organisation. 3 entry strategies are used in showing how the organisation can | A good analysis of how the organisation can enter the global environment using appropriate models. Analysis is limited and based on the motives for the organisation to operate globally. There is a good attempt to show at least, 2 strategic option(s) available to the organisation. 3 entry strategies are used in showing how the | Excellent understanding of motives for the organisation entering the global market with convincing explanation and application to the organisation and its environment. There is an excellent understanding and explanation of at least, 2 Strategic Option(s) available for the organisation to use as possible basis for entering the | Outstanding understanding of motives for the organisation entering the global market with convincing explanation and application to the organisation and its environment. There is an excellent understanding and explanation of at least, 2 Strategic Option(s) available for the organisation to use as possible basis for entering the Global Environment. A logical and well-argued approach is used in |
available to the organisation to enter the global environment | expansion only partially or not explored fully with an appropriate model. There is a limited understanding of at most, 2 Strategic Option(s) available for the organisation to use as a basis for entering the Global Environment. | enter and or operate in the global environment are applied to the context. There should be clear linkage between the 2 Strategic options and the entry strategies chosen. | organisation can enter and or operate in the global environment are applied to the context with analysis demonstrating why the strategies are appropriate to the organisation. There should be clear linkage between the 2 Strategic options and the entry strategies chosen. | Global Environment. A logical and well argued approach is used in determining which strategic Option(s) are chosen. Excellent knowledge of how the organisation can enter the global market using 3 appropriate models The suggestions demonstrate originality based on extended reading beyond the course material. | determining which strategic Option(s) are chosen. Excellent knowledge of how the organisation can enter the global market using at least 3 appropriate models The suggestions demonstrate originality based on extended reading beyond the course material. | |
LO 3: Evaluate the implications of global strategy to management practice within a business environment. | Inadequate or weak knowledge of of Corporate Strategy models which fails to explore and analyse corporate strategy. The proposals show an inadequate knowledge of | Limited knowledge and lack of understanding of Corporate Strategy models to explore and analyse a corporate strategy for the organisation. The proposals | Satisfactory knowledge of different aspects of Corporate Strategy using appropriate models. The proposals explore and analyses the theory of corporate strategy demonstrating understanding. | Good knowledge which critically analyses different aspects of Corporate Strategy Models that show supply chain dynamics. It shows critical insights into the application of | Excellent information and knowledge which deeply explores and critically evaluates the different aspects of Corporate Strategy. Emerging application of thoughts and practices at the forefront of | Outstanding information and knowledge which deeply explores and critically evaluates the different aspects of Corporate Strategy. Emerging application of thoughts and practices at the forefront of corporate strategy. Outstanding suggestions supported by solid, well- |
practices related to corporate strategy. There is limited reference to relevant theories. A weak understanding of the application of a chosen model to show how the organisation can increase profitability. | show a limited knowledge and understanding of relevant theories to the developmental a corporate strategy There is limited reference to theory A limited understanding of the application of a chosen model to show how the organisation can increase profitability. | Proposals provide analysis and synthesis of an upgraded corporate strategy. Satisfactory application of an appropriate model demonstrates how the organisation can increase profitability | Corporate Strategies, which upgrades those used by the organisation. It makes connections with implications for the organisation. Proposals demonstrate how the organisation can advance its corporate strategies on earlier identified entry strategies. There is evidence of extended reading beyond that of lecture materials. There is an advanced illustration of how the organisation can increase profitability using a model. | corporate strategy are demonstrated. Excellent suggestions supported by solid, well-reasoned arguments with clear originality and autonomy, detailing how the corporate strategies can be set out based on extensive extended reading, using a wide range of additional academic resources. There is an outstanding illustration of how the organisation can increase profitability using a model. The model used should show the regional location(s) which should change and how it should change its operation to increase profitability. | reasoned arguments with clear originality and autonomy, detailing how the corporate strategies can be set out. Based on extensive extended reading, using a wide range of additional academic resources. There is an outstanding illustration of how the organisation can increase profitability using a model. The model used should show the regional location(s) which should change and how it should change its operation to increase profitability. |
Carroll’s Pyramid model showing an inadequate knowledge and omissions in the discussion of these Strategic Purposes to its thoughts and practices. | Responsibility using a model, showing an inadequate knowledge and omissions in the discussion related to the organisation and to its thoughts and practices. Limited knowledge and lack of understanding of theory(s)/framework (s) for recommending improvements in CSR of the organisation. Limited knowledge and lack of understanding of ethics. Limited knowledge and lack of understanding of theory(s)/framework (s) to suggest ways the organisation can correct its ethical issues. | Satisfactory knowledge of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), with a model that explores and analyses the theory with some originality and detail. It provides satisfactory knowledge corrective remarks with model(s)/theorie s or frameworks, that show how the CSR of the organisation can improve the shortfalls referencing the course materials and other literature. It provides satisfactory corrective | Good knowledge of different aspects of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) with a model that shows critical insights into the application of Sustainability with some originality and detail. Good knowledge which evaluates different corrective measures with model(s)/theori es, showing how the CSR of the organisation can be corrected based on course materials and other literature. | which evaluates different corrective measures with model(s)/theori es, that shows how CSR of the organisation can be improved by balancing the deficiency with the application of the CSR model. Excellent knowledge of an of the Ethics, of the organisation with theories that deeply explores and critically evaluates the Ethics of the organisation’s strategy with some originality, detail supported by solid, well | explores and critically evaluates CSR with originality and detail, showing critical insights. Outstanding knowledge which evaluates different corrective measures with model(s)/theories that shows how CSR of the organisation can be improved by balancing the deficiency with the application of the CSR model. Outstanding knowledge of an analysis of Ethics, of the organisation with theories that deeply explores and critically evaluates the Ethics of the organisation’s strategy with some originality, detail, and autonomy supported by solid, well-reasoned arguments showing critical insights. Outstanding knowledge which evaluates different corrective measures with |
remarks supported by appropriate theories and or frameworks, that show how the Ethical issues of the organisation can be solved referencing course materials and other literature. | Good knowledge of different aspects of Ethical Dilemmas that shows critical insights into the Ethical dilemmas the organisation faces with originality and detail. Good knowledge which evaluates different corrective measures with model(s)/theori es, showing how the Ethics of the organisation can be corrected based on course materials and other literature. | reasoned arguments showing critical insights. Excellent knowledge which evaluates different corrective measures with model(s)/theori es, that shows how Ethics of the organisation can be improved or corrected. The answer demonstrated a wider reading than course materials provided. | model(s)/theories that shows how Ethics of the organisation can be improved or corrected. Extensive referencing of reading demonstrating from a wide range of appropriate sources. |
Referencing | Weak references with minor or insignificant errors or omissions. Lacking credibility | Limited use of appropriate references, with minor or insignificant errors. | Satisfactory with precise, full, and appropriate references. | Good with precise, full, and appropriate references of a high standard. | Excellent with precise, full, and appropriate references of near-publishing standard. | Outstanding with precise, full, and appropriate references of near publishing standard. |
Research Skills | Inadequate academic/ intellectual skills with some difficulties. Largely imitative and descriptive. Some difficulty with structure and accuracy in expression but developing practical/professional skills. | Limited academic/intellectua l skills. Original work with personal reflection and broad evidence-based critique. Solid structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/professiona l skills evident. | Satisfactory academic/intelle ctual skills. Wholly original work with good reflection and solid, well reasoned judgements forming from evidence-based critique. Consistent structure and accuracy in expression. Practical/profess ional skills established. | Good academic/intell ectual skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality and imagination | Excellent academic/intell ectual skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence, and imagination. | Outstanding academic/intellectual skills. Demonstrates intellectual originality, integrity, coherence, creativity and imagination working consistently in the higher cognitive domains to a professional standard. |
Leave A Comment