HI5029 Project Management T1 Assignment Help

 

Instructions

Academic  

Integrity 

Information

Holmes Institute is committed to ensuring and upholding academic integrity. All  assessment must comply with academic integrity guidelines. Important academic  integrity breaches include plagiarism, collusion, copying, impersonation, contract  cheating, data fabrication and falsification. Please learn about academic integrity  and consult your teachers with any questions. Violating academic integrity is  serious and punishable by penalties that range from deduction of marks, failure of  the assessment task or unit involved, suspension of course enrolment, or  cancellation of course enrolment.

Format  

Instructions

Most assessments must be in MS Word format with no spacing, 11-pt Calibri font and at least 2cm margins on all four sides with appropriate section  headings and page numbers. 

You must name your file with the Unit Code and Group Number (e.g. “HI5004  Group 4”). 

Check that you submit the correct document as special consideration is not  granted if you make a mistake. 

Student IDs need to be indicated on the cover page. Non-contributing students  do not receive marks.

Penalties 

All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date and time along  with a completed Assessment Cover Page. Late penalties apply. 

Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed  appropriately at the end in a reference list using Holmes Institute Adapted  Harvard Referencing. Penalties are associated with incorrect citation and  referencing.

 

Assignment Description 

This assessment will be completed in groups of 4 students. Groups will be formed within the first 2  weeks of class.  

Students are expected to critically evaluate the project requirements and provide a project plan that  includes 6 main parts (9 tasks) listed in the group assignment case study below. 

This assessment is worth 40% of the unit’s grade and is a major assessment. Groups are advised to  begin working on this assessment as soon as possible. 

Deliverable for this assessment as follows: 

Deliverable 

Weight 

Week Due

Group Case Study Report 

40% 

Week 9

Group Assignment Case Study 

Case Study: The Tech Innovators Project 

Background: 

A leading technology company, Tech Innovators, has embarked on a groundbreaking project to  develop a cutting-edge smart device that integrates artificial intelligence, IoT connectivity, and  advanced user interfaces. The project aims to revolutionize the consumer electronics market and  establish Tech Innovators as a pioneer in the field. 

Project Over Project

Name: SmartTechX 

Project Duration: 12 months 

Project Budget: $15 million 

Project Objectives: 

Design and develop a highly innovative smart device with AI capabilities. 

Ensure seamless integration with existing IoT ecosystems. 

Implement user-friendly interfaces and ensure a positive user experience. 

Meet strict quality and regulatory standards for consumer electronics.

 

 

Launch the product to market within the specified timeframe. 

Project Team: 

Project Manager: Group Leader 

Technical Lead: Member 1 

Design Specialist: Rachel Lewis 

Software Engineer: Member 2 

Quality Assurance Analyst: Member 3 

Marketing Specialist: Alex Turner 

Project Phases: 

Initiation (Months 1-2): 

Define project scope, objectives, and deliverables. 

Assemble the project team and allocate responsibilities. 

 

Develop a detailed project plan, including timelines and budget allocation. Planning (Months 3-4): 

Conduct market research and competitor analysis. 

Refine product specifications based on market insights. 

Develop a risk management plan and contingency strategies. 

Execution (Months 5-8): 

Begin product development, with regular team meetings and progress assessments. Establish communication channels and reporting mechanisms. 

Conduct user testing and gather feedback for iterative improvements. 

Monitoring and Controlling (Months 9-10): 

Regularly review project performance against key milestones. 

Implement changes based on feedback and unexpected challenges. 

Ensure adherence to quality and regulatory standards. 

Closing (Months 11-12): 

Finalize product development and conduct comprehensive testing. 

Develop marketing and launch strategies. 

Launch the SmartTechX device to the market. 

Challenges:

 

 

Rapidly evolving technology landscape. 

Balancing innovation with adherence to regulatory standards. 

Coordination among cross-functional teams. 

Market competition and changing consumer preferences. 

Tasks 

Your team is assigned the project of designing and implementing this Tech Innovators Project. Your  organization uses an agile development approach. Your lecturer will play the role of the project  sponsor. Your team will work collaboratively to develop a comprehensive project plan with detailed  timelines and resource allocation. The project sponsor will guide your team regarding the project  requirements and you are required to attend all the project meetings. In the meetings, your team  should discuss the steps to initiate this project and discuss how to progress. The above given are only  an indication of some basic requirements of the project. The actual project scope should be revised as  your project requirements. Your team is free to make necessary assumptions where necessary. You  are free to make suitable assumptions and alter the project scope, budget and schedule if required.  However, please indicate those parameters clearly in the introduction section. 

Once you established the necessary assumptions, your group need to produce project management  plans and other documents considering the project requirements you have selected. The completed project report should contain 6 main parts (9 tasks) as listed below: 

Part 1: Project Integration Management 

o Task 1: Prepare a business case 

o Task 2: Prepare the project charter 

Part 2: Project Scope Management 

o Task 3: Develop an initial scope management 

o Task 4: Develop a work breakdown structure (WBS) 

Part 3: Project Schedule Management 

o Task 5: Create Gantt chart for WBS, and then identify at least five milestones Part 4: Project Cost and Quality Management 

o Task 6: Develop documents for cost estimate and business case financial analysis Part 5: Project Resource Management 

o Task 7: Prepare a Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RACI Chart) for the WBS

 

 

Part 6: Project Risk Management 

o Task 8: Create a risk register 

o Task 9: Plot the risks on a Probability/Impact Matrix 

Deliverable Description 

Your group needs to submit the final version of your assignment in Week 9. The structure of the final  report is as follows: 

Executive Summary: The executive summary should provide an overview of the report’s  outcomes and be no longer than half a page. You can find helpful guidelines on how to write  an executive summary in this link:

Table of contents 

Introduction: State the purpose and objectives of the report. 

Part 1: Project Integration Management 

o Task 1: Prepare a business case 

o Task 2: Prepare the project charter 

Part 2: Project Scope Management 

o Task 3: Develop an initial scope management 

o Task 4: Develop a work breakdown structure (WBS) 

Part 3: Project Schedule Management 

o Task 5: Create Grantt chart for WBS, and then identify at least five milestones Part 4: Project Cost and Quality Management 

o Task 6: Develop documents for cost estimate and business case financial analysis Part 5: Project Resource Management 

o Task 7: Prepare a Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RACI Chart) for the WBS Part 6: Project Risk Management 

o Task 8: Create a risk register 

o Task 9: Plot the risks on a Probability/Impact Matrix 

Overall Summary: Summarize your findings, consolidating and drawing attention to the  main points of the report. 

Referencing: Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed

 

 

appropriately at the end in a reference list using Harvard referencing style. 

Appendix: Attach Meeting Agenda Minutes for 2 meetings. 

Your group can use the templates provided in the .zip file to complete the report.

Marking Rubric

Criteria 

Fail 

Pass 

Credit 

Distinction 

High Distinction

Task 1  

(4 marks)

Major errors in  business case  preparation.

Basic business  

case with some  errors.

Competent  

business case with  minor errors.

Well-structured and  insightful business  case.

Exceptional,  

innovative business  case.

Task 2  

(4 marks)

Major errors in  project charter  preparation.

Basic project  

charter with  

some errors.

Competent project  charter with minor  errors.

Well-structured and  insightful project  

charter.

Exceptional,  

innovative project  charter.

Task 3  

(4 marks)

Major errors in  initial scope  

management.

Basic initial scope  management  

with some errors.

Competent initial  scope management  with minor errors.

Well-structured and  insightful initial  

scope management.

Exceptional,  

innovative initial  

scope management.

Task 4  

(4 marks)

Major errors in  work  

breakdown  

structure  

development.

Basic work  

breakdown  

structure with  

some errors.

Competent work  breakdown  

structure with  

minor errors.

Well-structured and  insightful work  

breakdown  

structure.

Exceptional,  

innovative work  

breakdown  

structure.

Task 5  

(4 marks)

Major errors in  Gantt chart  

and milestone  identification.

Basic Gantt chart  with some errors.

Competent Gantt  chart with minor  errors.

Well-structured  

Gantt chart and  

insightful milestones.

Exceptional,  

innovative Gantt  

chart and  

milestones.

Task 6  

(4 marks)

Major errors in  cost estimate  and financial  analysis.

Basic cost  

estimate with  

some errors.

Competent cost  

estimate with  

minor errors.

Well-structured and  insightful cost  

estimate.

Exceptional,  

innovative cost  

estimate.

Task 7 

(4 marks)

Major errors in  RACI Chart  

preparation.

Basic RACI Chart  with some errors.

Competent RACI  Chart with minor  errors.

Well-structured and  insightful RACI Chart.

Exceptional,  

innovative RACI  

Chart.

Task 8 

(4 marks)

Major errors in  risk register  

creation.

Basic risk register  with some errors.

Competent risk  

register with minor  errors.

Well-structured and  insightful risk  

register.

Exceptional,  

innovative risk  

register.

Task 9 

(4 marks)

Major errors in  the risk matrix.

Basic plotting of  risks with some  errors.

Competent plotting  of risks with minor  errors.

Well-structured and  insightful risk matrix.

Exceptional,  

innovative risk  

matrix.

Appendix 

(4 marks)

Incomplete or  inaccurate  

meeting  

agenda. 

The minutes are  adequately  

detailed,  

capturing key  

points of  

discussion and  

decisions made.

Minutes  

demonstrate a  

good level of detail,  providing a clear  understanding of  the discussions and  decisions.

Minutes are  

comprehensive,  

offering a thorough  and insightful record  of discussions,  

decisions, and action  items.

Exceptional quality  minutes capturing  nuanced discussions  and demonstrating a  deep understanding  of the project.

 

 

Student Assessment Citation and Referencing Rules 

Adapted Harvard Referencing Rules 

Holmes has implemented a revised Harvard approach to referencing. The following rules apply:  1. Reference sources in assignments are limited to sources that provide full-text access to the  source’s content for lecturers and markers. 

2. The reference list must be located on a separate page at the end of the essay and titled:  “References”. 

3. The reference list must include the details of all the in-text citations, arranged A-Z  alphabetically by author surname with each reference numbered (1 to 10, etc.) and each  reference MUST include a hyperlink to the full text of the cited reference source. For  example: 

1. Hawking, P., McCarthy, B. & Stein, A. 2004. Second Wave ERP Education, Journal of  Information Systems Education, Fall,

4. All assignments must include in-text citations to the listed references. These must include the  surname of the author/s or name of the authoring body, year of publication, page number of  the content, and paragraph where the content can be found. For example, “The company  decided to implement an enterprise-wide data warehouse business intelligence strategies  (Hawking et al., 2004, p3(4)).” 

Non-Adherence to Referencing Rules 

Where students do not follow the above rules:  

1. For students who submit assignments that do not comply with the rules, a 10% penalty will  be applied.  

2. As per the Student Handbook, late penalties will apply each day after the student/s has been  notified of the due date.  

3. Students who comply with rules and the citations are “fake” may be reported for academic  misconduct.

 

 

Banner image

 

Submission Guidelines 

Your documents should be a single MS Word or OpenOffice document containing your report. Do  not use PDF as a submission format, 

All submissions will be submitted through the safe Assign facility in Blackboard. Submission boxes  linked to Safe Assign will be set up in the Units Blackboard Shell. Assignments not submitted through  these submission links will not be considered. 

Submissions must be made by the due date and time (which will be in the session detailed above)  and determined by your Unit coordinator. Submissions made after the due date and time will be  penalized per day late (including weekend days) according to Holmes Institute policies. 

The Safe Assign similarity score will be used in determining the level, if any, of plagiarism. Safe Assign will check conference web-sites, Journal articles, the Web and your own class members  submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Safe Assign similarity score (or match) when you  submit your assignment to the appropriate drop-box. If this is a concern you will have a chance to  change your assignment and resubmit. However, re-submission is only allowed prior to the  submission due date and time. After the due date and time have elapsed your assignment will be graded as late. Submitted assignments that indicate a high level of plagiarism will be penalized according to the Holmes Academic Misconduct policy, there will be no exceptions. Thus, plan early  and submit early to take advantage of the re-submission feature. You can make multiple submissions, but please remember we grade only the last submission, and the date and time you submitted will be taken from that submission.