GDECE106 ASSESSMENT-3 Curriculum Design Assignment Help

  • Task Description:

Design a one-week curriculum that incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture. Base your curriculum on  themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion. Use theoretical concepts from different  perspectives discussed in the class and critically reflect on the relationship between theories and pedagogy.

Criteria

• A design of a one-week curriculum that incorporates inquiry-based approaches to human culture.

• Clear basis of curriculum on themes from human culture such as history, philosophy, geography or religion. • Critical reflection of the relationship between theories and pedagogy.

Due Date: 10th of August, 2024, 11.59 PM

Word count: 2000 words equivalent +/- 10% (excluding references)

NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively  demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalizing all forms of academic dishonesty. Please  refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support  Coordinator or Librarian.

Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.

Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)

Extension requests must be granted in writing before the assignment due date. Contact your lecturer in writing for extensions of up to 7  calendar days. Longer extensions may be granted but require special consideration. Special consideration applications must also be submitted  before the date and require documentary evidence, such as medical certificates.

Grading Scale

Criteria

High Distinction (HD)

Distinction (D)

Credit (C)

Pass (P)

Not meeting

minimum

requirement (N)

C1. A design of a one week curriculum that  incorporates inquiry based approaches to  human culture.

(10 marks)

C1.1 A relevant

curriculum design is  clearly explained,

how to incorporates  inquiry-based

approaches to

human culture is

explained, including  critical reflection.

C1.2 A relevant

curriculum design is  clearly explained,

how to incorporates  inquiry-based

approaches to

human culture is

explained.

C1.3 A relevant

curriculum design is  described, how to  incorporates inquiry based approaches to  human culture is

outlined.

C1.4 curriculum

design is relevant,  how to incorporates  inquiry-based

approaches to

human culture is

mentioned.

C1.5 the curriculum  design is incomplete,  or irrelevant.

C2. Clear basis of

curriculum on

themes from human  culture such as

history, philosophy,  geography or

religion.

(10 marks)

C2.1 Basis of

curriculum on

themes from human  culture such as

history, philosophy,  geography or religion is clearly explained in  detail and in depth,  with critical

reflection.

C2.2 Basis of

curriculum on

themes from human  culture such as

history, philosophy,  geography or religion is clearly explained.

C2.3 Basis of

curriculum on

themes from human  culture such as

history, philosophy,  geography or religion  is clearly described.

C2.4 Basis of

curriculum on

themes from human  culture such as

history, philosophy,  geography or religion  is outlined.

C2.5 Basis of

curriculum on

themes from human  culture such as

history, philosophy,  geography or religion  is barely mentioned  or absent.

C3. Critical reflection  of the relationship  between theories

and pedagogy.

(10 marks)

C3.1 The relationship  between theories

and pedagogy is

explained in detail  and in depth, with critical reflection.

C3.2 The relationship  between theories

and pedagogy is

clearly explained

with relevant details.

C3.3 The relationship  between theories

and pedagogy is

clearly explained.

C3.4 The relationship  between theories

and pedagogy is

discussed, a clear

attempt has been  made to analyze

through the theories.

C3.5 The relationship  between theories

and pedagogy is

absent or inaccurate,  with no reference to  the theory.

C4. Draw on relevant  academic literature  to support your

explanation.

(5 marks)

C4.1 A broad range  of relevant academic  sources cited.

Sources effectively  support claims /

argument.

C4.2 A range of

relevant academic  sources cited.

Sources effectively  support claims /

argument.

C4.3 Relevant

academic sources  cited. Sources

effectively support  claims / arguments.

C4.4 Minimal

academic sources

cited. Sources do not  effectively support  claims / arguments.

C4.5 No academic  sources cited

/irrelevant academic  sources cited.

C5. Assignment is

formatted according  to requirements and  written clearly and  cohesively. APA 7

referencing is used.  Word limit is adhered  to.

(5 marks)

C5.1 The assignment  is clear and free of  topographical and  structural features  that hinder

understanding. There  is no confusion

between author

voice and that of

sources. The

assignment is

formatted according  to stated

requirements.

Accurate mechanics  of in-text and end-of

C5.2 The assignment  is clear with minor  typographical and  structural features  that may hinder

understanding. There  is minimal confusion  between author

voice and that of

sources. The

assignment is mostly  formatted according  to stated

requirements.

Accurate mechanics  of in-text and end-of

C5.3 The assignment  is clear with

topographical and  structural features  that may hinder

understanding. There  is minor confusion  between author

voice and that of

sources. The

assignment is partly  formatted according  to stated

requirements.

Mechanics of in-text  and end-of-text APA

C5.4 The assignment  has typographical

and structural

features that

significantly hinder  understanding. There  is confusion between the author’s voice and that  of sources.

The assignment is  minimally formatted  according to stated  requirements.

Mechanics of in-text  and end-of-text APA  (7th Ed.) referencing

C5.5 The assignment  has

typographical and  structural features  that prohibit

understanding. There  is confusion between  author voice and that  of sources, or

author’s voice is

absent. The

assignment is not

formatted according  to stated

requirements.

text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing style

were used. Word

limit met.

text APA (7th Ed.)  referencing style

were used with

minor inconsistencies  (no more than 2

errors).

Word limit met.

(7th Ed.) referencing  styles were used with  inconsistencies (no  more than 4 errors).

Word limit met.

contain several

errors.

Word limit met.

Mechanics of in-text  and end-of-text APA  (7th Ed.) referencing  style were not used

appropriately.

Word limit not met.

More Assignment Sample :