GDECE107 Early Childhood Assignment Help From Gradespire
GDECE 107 STEM in the Early Years Assessment 1 Rubric
Task description:
Review the research literature on STEM education and a range of recent (past 5 years) STEM education Apps currently available for children in the early years. Select three (3) Apps, one from each category discussed in class (construction, experimentation, skills-based, etc.) Describe the functions of the Apps and assess their potential to effectively engage with STEM concepts and skills and reflect the Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) (AGDE, 2022).
Criteria:
• Present current theoretically and empirically based understandings of STEM in early childhood education
• Appraise 3 applications designed to support the learning of STEM related concepts in early childhood education
• Draw on a range of academic sources and policy documents to support your argument (set texts must be used)
Word count: 2000
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: 24th July 2024, 11:59 PM

Grading Scale:
|
Grade
Criteria
|
High Distinction
|
Distinction
|
Credit
|
Pass
|
N: Does not meet
minimum standard
|
|
C1. Present current theoretically and
empirically based
understandings of
STEM in early
childhood education (10 marks)
|
1.1 Current
understandings of
STEM in ECE are clearly explained in detail,
with critical reflection. A broad range of
relevant academic
literature is drawn
upon.
|
1.2 Current
understandings of
STEM in ECE are
explained. A broad
range of relevant
academic literature is drawn upon.
|
1.3 Current
understandings of
STEM in ECE are
described accurately. A range of relevant
academic literature is drawn upon.
|
1.4 Current
understandings of
STEM in ECE are stated in brief and may
contain minor
misunderstandings. Literature drawn upon is relevant and from academic sources.
|
1.5 Discussion of
current understandings contains significant inaccuracies or
misunderstandings.
Literature drawn upon is irrelevant / not from academic sources.
|
|
C2. Appraise 3
applications designed to support the learning of STEM related
concepts in early
childhood education (15 marks – 5 marks per app)
|
2.1 3 applications are appraised. All relate to STEM concepts
appropriated for early childhood education.
|
2.2 3 applications are clearly explained. All relate to STEM
concepts appropriated for early childhood
education.
|
2.3 3 applications are clearly described. All relate to STEM
concepts appropriated for early childhood
education.
|
2.4 3 applications are notes in brief. All relate to STEM concepts
appropriated for early childhood education.
|
2.5 Less than 3
applications are
appraised. Applications do not address
required STEM foci.
|
|
C3. Assignment is
formatted according to requirements and
written clearly and
cohesively. APA 7
referencing is used. Word limit is adhered to.
(5 marks)
|
3.1 The assignment is clear and free of
typographical and
structural features that hinder understanding. There is no confusion between author voice and that of sources. The
assignment is formatted according to stated
requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used.
|
3.2 The assignment is clear with minor
typographical and
structural features that may hinder
understanding. There is minimal confusion
between author voice and that of sources. The
assignment is mostly
formatted according to stated requirements.
Accurate mechanics of in text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style
|
3.3 The assignment is clear with typographical and structural features that may hinder
understanding. There is minor confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is partly formatted
according to stated
requirements. Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with
|
3.4 The assignment has typographical and
structural features that significantly hinder
understanding. There is confusion between
author voice and that of sources.
The assignment is
minimally formatted
according to stated
requirements. Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing contain several errors.
|
3.5 The assignment has typographical and
structural features that prohibit understanding. There is confusion
between author voice and that of sources, or
author’s voice is absent. The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements.
Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were not used appropriately.
|
|
Word limit met.
|
were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors).
Word limit met.
|
inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors).
Word limit met.
|
Word limit met.
|
Word limit not met.
|
Leave A Comment