Project Portfolio and Project Management (MPMG405) Assignment Help
MPMG 405 Project Portfolio and Project
Management
Assessment Overview | |
Assessment | AT1 Individual Portfolio Proposal |
Mark | Total 25 |
Due Date | 11.55pm Friday, Week 5 |
Word limit | 2500 words |
Submission method | PDF file (.pdf) or Word (.doc), Via the Turnitin dropbox on eLearning |
Other requirements | o Use 12 pt font o Double-space your document to allow room for feedback o State your student’s name, student number in the document header o State the word count in the document header o Include a bibliography o Comply with the APA referencing style |
Assessment Details | |
For this assessment, you are required to prepare and submit a Portfolio Management proposal of 2500 words to the organisation chosen by your lecturer. The proposal consists in a critical analysis of the portfolio of the organisation and clearly indicates how the organisation can balance their Portfolio to achieve the organisation strategic objectives. You are required to substantiate the analysis of your selected case with relevant literature and explanation. Through the Portfolio Management Proposal students demonstrate an understanding of Portfolio Management, including Project Prioritisation, Resource allocation, and Risk Management. The Individual Portfolio Proposal should be structured into the following sections: Structure of the Assessment ➢ Cover Page ➢ Executive Summary |
➢ Table of Content ➢ Introduction and Organisation Background Briefly introduce the purpose of the Portfolio. Provide context and align with organisational strategy Provide a roadmap of the sections covered in the report. ➢ Portfolio Structure and Components Clearly outline the Portfolio’s Structure, including the types of components (programs and projects) included. Describe the governance framework, roles, and responsibilities. ➢ Strategic Alignment Describe how the Portfolio aligns with the Organisational Strategy Identify how the portfolio supports business objectives ➢ Stakeholder Analysis Identify key stakeholders and their interests or impacts on the portfolio Describe strategies for stakeholder engagement and communication ➢ Risk Management Plan Identify potential risks within the portfolio. Provide strategies for risk mitigation and management. Resource Management Plan Detail the approach for managing resources across the portfolio. Describe how resources will be allocated to maximise portfolio value. ➢ Performance Measurement and Monitoring Describe the metrics and processes used to monitor and measure portfolio performance. Identify how performance data will be used for decision-making ➢ Change Management Process Outline the process for managing changes within the portfolio. Describe how changes will be accessed, approved, and implemented. ➢ Extension and Realization Strategy Explain how the Portfolio will evolve over time. Describe strategies for realising benefits and capturing value from the portfolio. ➢ Conclusion Summarise the key findings of your analysis. Highlight the potential impact of the Portfolio ➢ Reference list |
Marking Criteria Refer to marking rubric below |
What if I Miss the Assessment? |
You must complete the AT1 on the due date and time. Late submissions: You may be penalised for failing to submit an assessment task on time. If you do not have authorisation, you may be penalised five (5) percent of awarded marks per day for up to five (5) days; thereafter your submission may not be accepted, and you may be awarded zero marks. If you miss the AT1 ONLY for following reasons, you may apply for special consideration: acute illness or loss or bereavement or hardship/trauma or technological problems which could not be anticipated or avoided |
To apply for special consideration, fill the following form and attach evidence to support your reason for seeking special consideration (with 5 days of the due date). o Special Consideration Application Form Link If your reason is invalid, if you do not provide evidence, or your application is not made within 5 days of due date your application will be rejected, and you will lose 10 marks for this course. |
Can I Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for this Assessment? |
You may use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT or Microsoft Co Pilot ONLY to research and brainstorm ideas and approaches for completing your essay. Please make sure to properly acknowledge any use of generative AI using CIM APA Referencing Guide. |
Rubric for AT1 Individual Portfolio Proposal
Criteria | HD (85-100%) | D (75-84%) | C (65-74%) | P (50-64%) | F (0-49%) |
Application of portfolio management principles to practice (10 marks) | Best portfolio management practices are logically and expertly incorporated in the specific context of the case. | Best portfolio management practices are logically and adequately incorporated. Almost all recommendations are suitable for the specific context of the case. | Portfolio management practices are usually logical and appropriately applied. Some aspects of the application are not accurate or suitable for the specific context of the case. | The application of portfolio management practices is sometimes logical; however, some elements are inaccurate or not adequately incorporated. | No use of portfolio management principles and relevant best practices. Poor or no inclusion of content or ideas relevant to the specific context of the case. |
Critical thinking and synthesis of case information and referencing (10 marks) | Insightful coverage of all required tasks with an excellent demonstration of critical thinking and analytical ability. The analysis shows an expert use of relevant and recent sources of evidence correctly referenced according to APA 7th style to support the analysis presented. | Very good understanding of portfolio management. Response covers all required tasks with the demonstration of critical thinking ability. The analysis shows a skillful use of relevant and recent sources of evidence correctly referenced according to APA 7th style to support the analysis presented. | Good understanding of portfolio management and response covers all required tasks. The analysis shows a generally good use of relevant sources of evidence referenced according to APA 7th style to support the analysis presented, with some inconsistencies or errors. | Generic responses to some required tasks. The analysis shows limited skills in the use of sources of evidence or a scant use of sources of evidence referenced according to APA 7th supporting the analysis presented with many errors. | The response does not cover most of the required tasks or is too descriptive and generalised. The analysis shows limited use of sources of evidence supporting the analysis presented, with sources used not referenced according to APA 7th. |
Communication: Clarity of exposition and written communication skills (5 marks) | The purpose of the writing is clear, and there is strong evidence of attention to the case’s details and consistent messaging. There are no errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | The purpose of the writing is clear, and there is good evidence of attention to the details of the case and mostly consistent messaging. There are or may be few errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation | The purpose of writing is clear, with enough evidence of attention to the case’s details. There are some errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | The purpose of writing is not entirely clear, with limited attention paid to the case’s details. There are many errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation. | The purpose of writing is unclear, and there is minimal attention to the case’s details. There are too many errors in spelling, grammar and punctuation. |
Leave A Comment